What is the difference....
What is the difference....
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
INTj: -Ti: abstraction, generality, universality, system, classification, typology, general laws, objectivity, true, validity, analysis, logic of a science, criteria.
ISTj: +Ti: Reality, detail, detailed study, carefulness, severity, place in hierarchies, laws, decisions, instructions, a choice of the best variant, logic of organization.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
What is the difference though in the way the function works, those are byproducts
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Those are the only distinct differences, as far as I know.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
OK, what would be the distinction between Ti in ESTP and ENTPOriginally Posted by gilligan87
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
My guess is that Ti of ESTP's delves deeply into realistic matters and the Ti of ENTP's delve deeply into theoretical matters. Since, secondary functions act upon the primary dominant function.Originally Posted by Dioklecian
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Excellent! Thatsè exactly what I had in mind.Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
I'm critical of these "aspects" of the functions simply because they could be explained without such a contrivance of the theory by merely noting it as a manifestatino of the information metabolism of a particular type.
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
Thats what functions are, manifestations of the particular type, but they are different from type to type.Originally Posted by MysticSonic
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
What I mean is that one need not posit some sort of aspect in order to explain the differences between the particular functioning of a particular functions between two distinct types, such as the differences in how Ti functions between an INTj and ISTj.
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
Ok, so how would you explain itOriginally Posted by MysticSonic
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
True, but it's just one more way to categorize things. And socionists seem to like categorizing/characterizing things, wouldn't you say?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Edited for gayness.
ENTp
Transigent has got lots of interesting info for us. Where does he get it from?
School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/
Transigent said exactly what I said in an expounded form. :/
::Needs to be less obscure::
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
You have to use more words to express yourself, not necessarily to change your style. And so you can be sure the way you envision things is understood by others as well. That's probably the best thing I've learned on this forum.Originally Posted by MysticSonic
I noticed that we talk many times about the same things to the degree that we do not remeber any more who said exactly what. And it may well be some sort of subcouncious learning. For example, somebody said something I could hardly understand but then you come to the ideas which you may perceive as your own while somebody already have said it or mentioned it in a different form. Well, thanks to all who helps me directly and indirectly to understand more about socionics.
xxxxxxxxx
School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/
Thanks, that also relates to all other types. Fe from an ENFj is different from Fe from an ESFj. Since the two functions blend to become a whole so it's more like FeSi compared to FeNi and those are two different things.Originally Posted by Dioklecian
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5