I’ve noticed that people with Te PoLR tend to disbelieve things that contradict their own experiences, and sometimes even have an easy time ignoring information that doesn’t agree with what they already know. Since Te is heavily related to external information, it makes sense that those weak in Te would have difficulty assessing how ‘correct’ that information is.
They also seem to have difficulty searching for information and assembling that information in a way that appears organized to an outside observer. A Te PoLR person always organizes information (like when explaining things verbally, or writing an outline—for example) in a way more consistent with the experience they had when hunting the information down; as well as more consistent with the message they wish to impart in listeners/viewers (Fe oriented—their creative function).
I think this is where Ti dual seeking comes in. Ti is related to consistency of information, and pinpointing the breakdown of ‘sense’ within a system. A Ti individual (ENTp or ESTp) won’t put emphasis on Te aspects of information, like focusing on external facts and their relevancy; instead they will build upon information and self-make a system of thought that is consistent with themselves and what they experience (Ti).
A process which goes hand-in-hand with the IxFp who builds experience based knowledge but is unsure of their own personal competence and looks for clarity in the information they find. A ExTp is able to point out inconsistencies in the information a IxFp brings forth, without using a long-winded explanation that delves deeply into details—which would poke the Te PoLR, making them less likely to listen.
In contrast, with Ti-leading types and their duals (ENFj-ISTj and ESFj-INTj) you see that in cases where the building of emotional atmospheres drifts too far in a direction, the Ti-leading will concisely, logically, and consistently “point out” the less than rational direction the ExFj is taking in a way that doesn’t disrupt the mood but does prompt the ExFj to redirect it (if they please, that is). There’s the same treatment of information, but it’s even more the center of their interactions.