New socionics test- this one gives subtypes

[Marie84]

Take for example Marie84 who's a blatant LSI, she types EII, the type she is convinced to be, despite the most obvious of the flaws of this test: any ethical person unaware of Socionics but is interested in science, history, or other any discipline instead of "people" (or rationalizes his/her decisions, and so on...) will type necessarily as Logical.

As I've already told you, the fact that you believe Phaedrus to be IEE, and me LSI, indicates that the Socionics system you created in your mind to be something utterly different than Model A

On a related note, I find your Führer Socionics attitude of commanding people into types to be incredibly dickish

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Wynch]

Wow, I really liked this test. Some of the options for responses I felt could be trimmed down, but I liked the ability to rank your preference on a scale that was not numerical. I like to quantify things as if I'm using a scale.

My Results:

Your socionics type is ILE-1Ti (ENTp).

Other possible types:
LII (75% as likely as ILE)
ILI (66% as likely as ILE)
LIE (61% as likely as ILE)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (70%)
Secondary: Aggressor (30%)

Mental Block
1. Ne 35 35
2. Ti 40 40
3. Se 15 15
4. Fi 10 10

Vital Block
5. Si 15 35
6. Fe 10 40
7. Ni 35 15
8. Te 40 10

IM Pathways
1. Ne-->Ti (56%)
2. Se-->Ti (24%)
3. Ne-->Fi (14%)
4. Se-->Fi (6%)

[Marie84]

Phaedrus' type, "my" system and your personal view on my attitude are not part of this discussion, but of your usual diversion I'm not interested in. You are Socionics LSI, so it doesn't matter if I use another system or not.

My intentions is to warn the readers about things I know from the other forum about the topic.

To warn people? You're not a harold of "the truth", no one is. People are free to make-up their own minds on things

Your immense obsession with categorizing users into types is futile and diskish, as you have no authority over Socionics to arrange people into your self-imposed hierarchy

Hahaha! LSI writes on your forehead, even!

Thanks for the post, Marie. Strange for a Delta NF to support strong Ti methodologies, right?

Actually I noticed in your posts that you recently became very interested in this type, perhaps you know - or at least you think - I'm right, it's just you find hard to admit I am, 'cause you perceive this as an admission of guilt.

Admit the fact, no one will condemn you, especially since you're Gilly's dual .

You're right, I am interested in learning about LSI's and all the 16 types to broaden my understanding of people. I don't believe that they're superior and inferior types, thus you labeling me an LSI doesn't offend me though it does show your misinterpretation of Socionics.

btw, I think the EIE's here are great people and anyone should be lucky to call themselves their dual.
You, on the other-hand, have shown yourself to be a disservice to your types reputation via your contemptible behavior and arrogance

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[krieger]

As I've already told you, the fact that you believe Phaedrus to be IEE, and me LSI, indicates that the Socionics system you created in your mind to be something utterly different than Model A

I sanction and second this statement.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[krieger]

It is no surprise you sympathize with Marie84, you are the same type.

Pure comedy. You'll retype the whole forum to keep your system consistent.

Is RSV3's a good test?

I haven't yet found a good reason to look at it and don't think I will anytime soon. Judging on the basis of the quality of previous tests my expectations are dismal.

[Marie84]

Whatever, fine, if you believe me to be an LSI (or another type) so be it.

Your general behavior of commanding people into types is arrogant and futile as I disagree with your general knowledge of Classical Socionics and, thus, can't really argue the matter with you since we seem to have utterly different views on it

[leckysupport]

As I've already told you, the fact that you believe Phaedrus to be IEE, and me LSI, indicates that the Socionics system you created in your mind to be something utterly different than Model A

I sanction and second this statement.

Preach.

[xkj220]

Your socionics type is ILE-0 (ENTp).
Other possible types:
LII (77% as likely as ILE)
ILI (61% as likely as ILE)
SLE (61% as likely as ILE)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (72%)
Secondary: Aggressor (28%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ne 36 36
2. Ti 39 39
3. Se 14 14
4. Fi 11 11

Vital Block
5. Si 14 36
6. Fe 11 39
7. Ni 36 14
8. Te 39 11
IM Pathways
1. Ne-->Ti (56%)
2. Se-->Ti (22%)
3. Ne-->Fi (16%)
4. Se-->Fi (6%)

Ideal Partner: SEI-0 (ISFp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Si 36 36
2. Fe 39 39
3. Ni 14 14
4. Te 11 11

Vital Block
5. Ne 14 36
6. Ti 11 39
7. Se 36 14
8. Fi 39 11


wtf?

[Nexus]

I hate tests like this I can never make my mind up where I should put the slider.

Give me an A or B Test I can't do these.

You sound decisive to me

I set each slider to the max, because I am introverted judging...

[Morcheeba]

Your socionics type is EIE-1Fe (ENFj).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other possible types:
IEE (82% as likely as EIE)
IEI (79% as likely as EIE)
ESE (71% as likely as EIE)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quadra: Beta
Club: Humanitarian
Romance Styles:
Primary: Victim (70%)
Secondary: Caregiver (30%)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Fe 40 40
2. Ni 35 35
3. Te 10 10
4. Si 15 15

Vital Block
5. Ti 10 40
6. Se 15 35
7. Fi 40 10
8. Ne 35 15

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IM Pathways
1. Fe-->Ni (56%)
2. Fe-->Si (24%)
3. Te-->Ni (14%)
4. Te-->Si (6%)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ideal Partner: LSI-1Ti (ISTj)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ti 40 40
2. Se 35 35
3. Fi 10 10
4. Ne 15 15

Vital Block
5. Fe 10 40
6. Ni 15 35
7. Te 40 10
8. Si 35 15

[The Exception]

I hate tests like this I can never make my mind up where I should put the slider.

Give me an A or B Test I can't do these.

I much prefer the sliders to forced choice questions. That way I can indicate degree of preference (or no preference) between the two options.

Hmmm, is preference for sliders vs. forced choice type related?

[RSV3]

Let's get on topic again, please, the creator of the test will get away again without clarifying:

@RSV3: did that graph changed since my suggestion Page 2- New Socionics Test Ramble Mumble? You never answered, but because of that flaw I typed ILI at the short test.

I don't know. I updated the graph aesthetically once but other then that it remained the same. The short test isn't meant to be taken seriously, it's mostly a joke; I don't expect a 2 question test to have any level of accuracy. I'm sorry you typed as ILI, and if I try to get away with anything else, let me know.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[sarinana]

Your socionics type is ILE-1Ne (ENTp).
Other possible types:
IEE (92% as likely as ILE)
ILI (88% as likely as ILE)
LIE (74% as likely as ILE)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (80%)
Secondary: Aggressor (20%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ne 40 40
2. Ti 35 35
3. Se 10 10
4. Fi 15 15

Vital Block
5. Si 10 40
6. Fe 15 35
7. Ni 40 10
8. Te 35 15


SOCIONICS CAN GO TO HELL!!!

[Galen]

The test tends to get quadra values down pretty well, but temperaments still need work.

[717495]

The test tends to get quadra values down pretty well, but temperaments still need work.

Ah, well ESFj was the lowest, and ISFp was a much higher percentage but still low. So that's why I was thinking dichotomies might sort of weigh this test out, and the problem exists within the quadra values interpretation.

Oh, it's a test. Nevermind, I'll stop criticising.

[greed]

Your socionics type is IEE-2Ne (ENFp).
Other possible types:
ILE (90% as likely as IEE)
EII (71% as likely as IEE)
IEI (68% as likely as IEE)

Quadra: Delta
Club: Humanitarian
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (86%)
Secondary: Aggressor (14%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ne 43 43
2. Fi 32 32
3. Se 7 7
4. Ti 18 18

Vital Block
5. Si 7 43
6. Te 18 32
7. Ni 43 7
8. Fe 32 18
IM Pathways
1. Ne-->Fi (55%)
2. Ne-->Ti (31%)
3. Se-->Fi (9%)
4. Se-->Ti (5%)

Ideal Partner: SLI-2Si (ISTp)

Probably about right, but I kind of feel like my strength in Te should be higher

I also like the way it breaks down the use of IM pathways.. now that's probably about accurate.

[MatthewZ]

Took the test again. Significantly different results. (last time I got ILI-2Te, with LII 97% as likely)

This test posted below:

Your socionics type is LII-1Ne (INTj).
Other possible types:
ILE (88% as likely as LII)
ILI (82% as likely as LII)
SLI (74% as likely as LII)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (80%)
Secondary: Aggressor (20%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ti 35 35
2. Ne 40 40
3. Fi 15 15
4. Se 10 10

Vital Block
5. Fe 15 35
6. Si 10 40
7. Te 35 15
8. Ni 40 10
IM Pathways
1. Ti-->Ne (56%)
2. Fi-->Ne (24%)
3. Ti-->Se (14%)
4. Fi-->Se (6%)

[FDG]

Your socionics type is LIE-0 (ENTj).
Other possible types:
ILI (67% as likely as LIE)
EIE (59% as likely as LIE)
ILE (55% as likely as LIE)

Quadra: Gamma
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Victim (78%)
Secondary: Caregiver (22%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Te 36 36
2. Ni 39 39
3. Fe 14 14
4. Si 11 11

Vital Block
5. Fi 14 36
6. Se 11 39
7. Ti 36 14
8. Ne 39 11
IM Pathways
1. Te-->Ni (56%)
2. Fe-->Ni (22%)
3. Te-->Si (16%)
4. Fe-->Si (6%)

Ideal Partner: ESI-0 (ISFj)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Fi 36 36
2. Se 39 39
3. Ti 14 14
4. Ne 11 11

Vital Block
5. Te 14 36
6. Ni 11 39
7. Fe 36 14
8. Si 39 11

[Hot Scalding Gayser]

If you are not aware of your outside environment, even if you are a natural introvert, that is dangerous. You can't live and function if you don't pay attention to your surroundings. Daydreaming....walking next to a pillar. Oops you just bumped into something and destroyed the whole world.

I hate tests like these.

[Timeless]

Does this test no longer give detailed results?

This is all I'm getting:

Sociotype: ILE

aka ENTp, The Inventor, , and Intuitive Logical Extrovert.
Other Possible Types

LII (74% as likely as ILE)
IEE (68% as likely as ILE)
EII (56% as likely as ILE)

---

Anyone know another test that gives subtypes and/or more detailed results?

[The Exception]

Does this test no longer give detailed results?

This is all I'm getting:

Sociotype: ILE

aka ENTp, The Inventor, , and Intuitive Logical Extrovert.
Other Possible Types

LII (74% as likely as ILE)
IEE (68% as likely as ILE)
EII (56% as likely as ILE)

---

Anyone know another test that gives subtypes and/or more detailed results?

I'd say maybe Ti subtype since your mirror type is your second highest but IEE is close behind. So slight Ti or balanced going from the test result.

Sorry I don't know of any other tests that give subtypes.

The two below, rank all 16 types from top to bottom by likelihood:

Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!

Socionics - Socionics test

[The Exception]

Went and redid the test:


Sociotype: LII

aka INTj, The Analyst, , and Logical Intuitive Introvert.
Other Possible Types

1. EII (76% as likely as LII)
2. ILE (72% as likely as LII)
3. ILI (52% as likely as LII)
4. SEE (0.00001% as likely as LII)

[Timeless]

I'd say maybe Ti subtype since your mirror type is your second highest but IEE is close behind. So slight Ti or balanced going from the test result.

I was thinking the same thing too...

Sorry I don't know of any other tests that give subtypes.

The two below, rank all 16 types from top to bottom by likelihood:

Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!

Socionics - Socionics test

I get ILE on those too... I just wanted to see more numbers. I wonder why the detailed results were taken away from this test though?

• SEE (0.00001% as likely as LII)

So, there is a slight possibility you're an SEE?

[kitteh]

Sociotype: SEE
Other Possible Types

1. SLI (87% as likely as SEE)
2. ESI (80% as likely as SEE)
3. ESE (78% as likely as SEE)

[The Exception]

I was thinking the same thing too...


I get ILE on those too... I just wanted to see more numbers. I wonder why the detailed results were taken away from this test though?

Maybe because they turned out to not be very accurate?

So, there is a slight possibility you're an SEE?

Never say never!

I'd be a really atypical one but why not?

[redbaron]

aka INFp, The Romantic, , and Intuitive Ethical Introvert.
Other Possible Types

1. EIE (79% as likely as IEI)
2. SEI (56% as likely as IEI)
3. ESE (55% as likely as IEI)

lol

[Capitalist Pig]

I got ILI.

Other possibilities:

• LIE (96% as likely as ILI)
• SLI (90% as likely as ILI)
• LII (88% as likely as ILI)

[Gilly]

Sociotype: IEI
aka INFp, The Romantic, , and Intuitive Ethical Introvert.
Other Possible Types
EIE (91% as likely as IEI)
EII (73% as likely as IEI)
LIE (70% as likely as IEI)

[Creepy-male]

Sociotype: SEI

aka ISFp, The Mediator, , and Sensing Ethical Introvert.
Other Possible Types

ESE (79% as likely as SEI)
ESI (56% as likely as SEI)
SEE (53% as likely as SEI)

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Satan]

Sociotype: SEE

aka ESFp, The Diplomat, , and Sensing Ethical Extrovert.
Other Possible Types

SLE (99% as likely as SEE)
ESE (88% as likely as SEE)
SLI (72% as likely as SEE)

How'd that happen?

[Mediator Kam]

I got ESE and SEI at 97%.

[redbaron]

Sociotype: SEE

aka ESFp, The Diplomat, , and Sensing Ethical Extrovert.
Other Possible Types

SLE (99% as likely as SEE)
ESE (88% as likely as SEE)
SLI (72% as likely as SEE)

How'd that happen?

cause you're E-7?

[Satan]

cause you're E-7?

no excuse, i think it's probably just cos i answer that i liked to work hard play hard less vaguely than most of the other questions...

i'm terrible with these tests... i try to be balanced blah blah ...

do i prefer this or that... it's all so detached any meaningless for the most part...

thing is that's a bit of a lie in some ways. i can be pretty lazy. ..

but i have no idea how to change just that one without redoing the whole test.

[redbaron]

no excuse, i think it's probably just cos i answer that i liked to work hard play hard less vaguely than most of the other questions...

i'm terrible with these tests... i try to be balanced blah blah ...

do i prefer this or that... it's all so detached any meaningless for the most part...

thing is that's a bit of a lie in some ways. i can be pretty lazy. ..

but i have no idea how to change just that one without redoing the whole test.

eh, don't worry about it. we know you're SLE.

[Galen]

One more time

ENFp, The Psychologist, and Intuitive Ethical Extrovert.
Other Possible Types

EII (95% as likely as IEE)
ESI (50% as likely as IEE)
IEI (50% as likely as IEE)