New socionics test- this one gives subtypes

**tereg** · 10-27-2009, 03:03 PM

Your socionics type is ILI-0 (INTp).
Other possible types:
LII (86% as likely as ILI)
ILE (82% as likely as ILI)
SLI (78% as likely as ILI)

Quadra: Gamma
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Victim (72%)
Secondary: Caregiver (28%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ni 36 36
2. Te 39 39
3. Si 14 14
4. Fe 11 11

Vital Block
5. Se 14 36
6. Fi 11 39
7. Ne 36 14
8. Ti 39 11
IM Pathways
1. Ni-->Te (56%)
2. Si-->Te (22%)
3. Ni-->Fe (16%)
4. Si-->Fe (6%)

Ideal Partner: SEE-0 (ESFp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Se 36 36
2. Fi 39 39
3. Ne 14 14
4. Ti 11 11

Vital Block
5. Ni 14 36
6. Te 11 39
7. Si 36 14
8. Fe 39 11

.

**marooned** · 10-27-2009, 03:29 PM

Your socionics type is ILI-1Te (INTp).

Other possible types:
LII (99% as likely as ILI)
SLI (93% as likely as ILI)
EII (86% as likely as ILI)

Quadra: Gamma
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Victim (68%)
Secondary: Caregiver (32%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ni 34 34
2. Te 41 41
3. Si 16 16
4. Fe 9 9

Vital Block
5. Se 16 34
6. Fi 9 41
7. Ne 34 16
8. Ti 41 9

IM Pathways
1. Ni-->Te (56%)
2. Si-->Te (26%)
3. Ni-->Fe (12%)
4. Si-->Fe (6%)

Ideal Partner: SEE-1Fi (ESFp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Se 34 34
2. Fi 41 41
3. Ne 16 16
4. Ti 9 9

Vital Block
5. Ni 16 34
6. Te 9 41
7. Si 34 16
8. Fe 41 9

**munenori2** · 10-27-2009, 03:55 PM

Your socionics type is SEI-1Fe (ISFp).

Other possible types:
IEI (79% as likely as SEI)
SLI (72% as likely as SEI)
ESE (68% as likely as SEI)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Social
Romance Styles:
Primary: Caregiver (68%)
Secondary: Victim (32%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Si 34 34
2. Fe 41 41
3. Ni 16 16
4. Te 9 9

Vital Block
5. Ne 16 34
6. Ti 9 41
7. Se 34 16
8. Fi 41 9

IM Pathways
1. Si-->Fe (56%)
2. Ni-->Fe (26%)
3. Si-->Te (12%)
4. Ni-->Te (6%)

Ideal Partner: ILE-1Ti (ENTp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ne 34 34
2. Ti 41 41
3. Se 16 16
4. Fi 9 9

Vital Block
5. Si 16 34
6. Fe 9 41
7. Ni 34 16
8. Te 41 9

Oh, I did get an error a couple of times that answers to questions 1-10 were inconsistent. I had to slide one of them until it would go on to the second set.

**garance** · 10-27-2009, 04:34 PM

Your socionics type is EII-1Ne (INFj).
Other possible types:
LII (89% as likely as EII)
IEE (80% as likely as EII)
ESI (69% as likely as EII)
Mental Block
1. Fi 34 34
2. Ne 41 41
3. Ti 16 16
4. Se 9 9

Vital Block
5. Te 16 34
6. Si 9 41
7. Fe 34 16
8. Ni 41 9

**Socionics Is A Cult** · 10-27-2009, 05:15 PM

Your socionics type is LII-1Ne (INTj).
Other possible types:
EII (82% as likely as LII)
ILE (80% as likely as LII)
ILI (67% as likely as LII)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (82%)
Secondary: Aggressor (18%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ti 34 34
2. Ne 41 41
3. Fi 16 16
4. Se 9 9

Vital Block
5. Fe 16 34
6. Si 9 41
7. Te 34 16
8. Ni 41 9
IM Pathways
1. Ti-->Ne (56%)
2. Fi-->Ne (26%)
3. Ti-->Se (12%)
4. Fi-->Se (6%)

Ideal Partner: ESE-1Si (ESFj)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Fe 34 34
2. Si 41 41
3. Te 16 16
4. Ni 9 9

Vital Block
5. Ti 16 34
6. Ne 9 41
7. Fi 34 16
8. Se 41 9

**Mea** · 10-27-2009, 06:30 PM

Your socionics type is LII-1Ne (INTj).
Other possible types:
ILI (92% as likely as LII)
ILE (84% as likely as LII)
LIE (79% as likely as LII)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (80%)
Secondary: Aggressor (20%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ti 35 35
2. Ne 40 40
3. Fi 15 15
4. Se 10 10

Vital Block
5. Fe 15 35
6. Si 10 40
7. Te 35 15
8. Ni 40 10
IM Pathways
1. Ti-->Ne (56%)
2. Fi-->Ne (24%)
3. Ti-->Se (14%)
4. Fi-->Se (6%)

Ideal Partner: ESE-1Si (ESFj)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Fe 35 35
2. Si 40 40
3. Te 15 15
4. Ni 10 10

Vital Block
5. Ti 15 35
6. Ne 10 40
7. Fi 35 15
8. Se 40 10

okaaay

**ArchonAlarion** · 10-27-2009, 06:43 PM

Your socionics type is ILE-0 (ENTp).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other possible types:
LII (91% as likely as ILE)
ILI (66% as likely as ILE)
LIE (62% as likely as ILE)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (74%)
Secondary: Aggressor (26%)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ne 37 37
2. Ti 38 38
3. Se 13 13
4. Fi 12 12

Vital Block
5. Si 13 37
6. Fe 12 38
7. Ni 37 13
8. Te 38 12

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IM Pathways
1. Ne-->Ti (56%)
2. Se-->Ti (20%)
3. Ne-->Fi (18%)
4. Se-->Fi (6%)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ideal Partner: SEI-0 (ISFp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Si 37 37
2. Fe 38 38
3. Ni 13 13
4. Te 12 12

Vital Block
5. Ne 13 37
6. Ti 12 38
7. Se 37 13
8. Fi 38 12

**Simon Ssmall** · 10-27-2009, 06:47 PM

Your socionics type is IEE-1Fi (ENFp).
Other possible types:
IEI (93% as likely as IEE)
EIE (89% as likely as IEE)
ESE (84% as likely as IEE)

Quadra: Delta
Club: Humanitarian
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (68%)
Secondary: Aggressor (32%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ne 34 34
2. Fi 41 41
3. Se 16 16
4. Ti 9 9

Vital Block
5. Si 16 34
6. Te 9 41
7. Ni 34 16
8. Fe 41 9
IM Pathways
1. Ne-->Fi (56%)
2. Se-->Fi (26%)
3. Ne-->Ti (12%)
4. Se-->Ti (6%)

Ideal Partner: SLI-1Te (ISTp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Si 34 34
2. Te 41 41
3. Ni 16 16
4. Fe 9 9

Vital Block
5. Ne 16 34
6. Fi 9 41
7. Se 34 16
8. Ti 41 9

One thing I don't get is how I can be Infantile (68%) but at the same time have IEI (93% as likely as IEE). Same things with other people taking the test it seems.

Creepy-Diana · 10-27-2009, 06:55 PM

.

**duality is cringe** · 10-27-2009, 06:59 PM

Your socionics type is ILI-1Te (INTp).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other possible types:
LIE (87% as likely as ILI)
SLI (79% as likely as ILI)
LII (71% as likely as ILI)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quadra: Gamma
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Victim (66%)
Secondary: Caregiver (34%)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ni 33 33
2. Te 42 42
3. Si 17 17
4. Fe 8 8

Vital Block
5. Se 17 33
6. Fi 8 42
7. Ne 33 17
8. Ti 42 8

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IM Pathways
1. Ni-->Te (55%)
2. Si-->Te (29%)
3. Ni-->Fe (11%)
4. Si-->Fe (5%)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ideal Partner: SEE-1Fi (ESFp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Se 33 33
2. Fi 42 42
3. Ne 17 17
4. Ti 8 8

Vital Block
5. Ni 17 33
6. Te 8 42
7. Si 33 17
8. Fe 42 8

For some reason, I am less pleased with the updated version.

**duality is cringe** · 10-27-2009, 07:20 PM

For some reason, Mimosa and I both used the phrase "for some reason" in the posts containing our initial reactions to the revised test.

**implied** · 10-27-2009, 07:28 PM

Your socionics type is LII-1Ne (INTj).
Other possible types:
ILE (81% as likely as LII)
IEE (79% as likely as LII)
EII (74% as likely as LII)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (84%)
Secondary: Aggressor (16%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ti 33 33
2. Ne 42 42
3. Fi 17 17
4. Se 8 8

Vital Block
5. Fe 17 33
6. Si 8 42
7. Te 33 17
8. Ni 42 8
IM Pathways
1. Ti-->Ne (55%)
2. Fi-->Ne (29%)
3. Ti-->Se (11%)
4. Fi-->Se (5%)

Ideal Partner: ESE-1Si (ESFj)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Fe 33 33
2. Si 42 42
3. Te 17 17
4. Ni 8 8

Vital Block
5. Ti 17 33
6. Ne 8 42
7. Fi 33 17
8. Se 42 8

both of these tests were bad.

**Simon Ssmall** · 10-27-2009, 07:44 PM

Originally Posted by Mimosa Pudica

For some reason I found almost all questions hard to answer. I wanted to answer "neither" or "both" a lot of times, so I ended up answering too few questions to get a result. When I forced myself to chose answers, I got ILE-1Ti.

I think I noticed that you either think the answers are too predictable or too hard to answer for all tests you take.

**duality is cringe** · 10-27-2009, 08:03 PM

Originally Posted by Carla

What do the numbers in front of the subtypes mean again?

Before the test was revised, the numbers were used to denote the strength of one's subtype, I believe ranging from 1-5. Now, everyone who gets a subtype seems to get a 1 before it.

**RSV3** · 10-27-2009, 09:03 PM

Well alright, judging by the responses, it sounds like this test has a few problems I need to address.

Originally Posted by Ssmall

One thing I don't get is how I can be Infantile (68%) but at the same time have IEI (93% as likely as IEE). Same things with other people taking the test it seems.

The erotic attitude ratio is solely derived from the strength of the two perceiving functions in your mental block. The type possibility, otoh, is simply the score of the possible type as a numerator divided by the score of the most probable type as a denominator.

So I'll try to sum up quickly how this test operates and address some of the problems people have encountered. The test is broken into two sets. The primary function of the first set is to ascertain which club you fall into. This is important because the questions you get in the second set will vary depending on what club you were placed into based on the first set. Thus to prevent an erroneous placement into the wrong club in the first set, I required a certain threshold of consistency (i.e., the most dominant club must have each of it's two dichotomic traits be at least 143% greater than the opposing trait for each dichotomy) before the second set could be reached. Apparently this has caused more problems than it solved. Additionally, the test requires the taker to answer approximately 75% of the questions in the first set and 50% of the questions in the second set before it will proceed.

The primary function of the second set is to determine which quadra you are in. A minority function of both sets is to determine subtype. For example, the main purpose of the last three questions in the second set is to determine subtype.

I'll be happy to answer any questions anyone has and appreciate suggestions as to how the test could be improved.

**DirectorAbbie** · 10-27-2009, 10:24 PM

Your socionics type is LSE-0 (ESTj).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other possible types:
LIE (81% as likely as LSE)
LSI (78% as likely as LSE)
SLI (72% as likely as LSE)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quadra: Delta
Club: Pragmatist
Romance Styles:
Primary: Caregiver (76%)
Secondary: Victim (24%)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Te 37 37
2. Si 38 38
3. Fe 13 13
4. Ni 12 12

Vital Block
5. Fi 13 37
6. Ne 12 38
7. Ti 37 13
8. Se 38 12

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IM Pathways
1. Te-->Si (56%)
2. Fe-->Si (20%)
3. Te-->Ni (18%)
4. Fe-->Ni (6%)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ideal Partner: EII-0 (INFj)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Fi 37 37
2. Ne 38 38
3. Ti 13 13
4. Se 12 12

Vital Block
5. Te 13 37
6. Si 12 38
7. Fe 37 13
8. Ni 38 12

**Blaze** · 10-27-2009, 10:44 PM

Your socionics type is ILE-0 (ENTp).

Other possible types:
LII (81% as likely as ILE)
IEE (68% as likely as ILE)
SLE (61% as likely as ILE)

Quadra: Alpha
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (74%)
Secondary: Aggressor (26%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ne 37 37
2. Ti 38 38
3. Se 13 13
4. Fi 12 12

Vital Block
5. Si 13 37
6. Fe 12 38
7. Ni 37 13
8. Te 38 12

IM Pathways
1. Ne-->Ti (56%)
2. Se-->Ti (20%)
3. Ne-->Fi (18%)
4. Se-->Fi (6%)

Ideal Partner: SEI-0 (ISFp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Si 37 37
2. Fe 38 38
3. Ni 13 13
4. Te 12 12

Vital Block
5. Ne 13 37
6. Ti 12 38
7. Se 37 13
8. Fi 38 12

**MysticSonic** · 10-27-2009, 11:39 PM

I answered honestly.

The test told me to lie.

**Park** · 10-28-2009, 12:40 AM

Do most of you agree with these club descriptions?

Your focus is on productivity, function, achievement, efficiency, effecting change, building, engineering, business, and/or acquiring power. You are very pragmatic and seek to improve your own individual position. - ST

Your focus is on the greater societal needs and problems; you often have interests in philosophy, art, psychology, sociology, and/or politics. You are very humanitarian and seek to improve society. - NF

Your focus is on researching areas of interest. You often put much thought and time into an area of interest, finding information on the topic, making conclusions and deductions, and then presenting these plans, hypotheses, theories, and predictions. You value understanding and knowledge with less emphasis on either your personal benefit or society’s. - NT

You care about people, making connections with them, and interpersonal interactions. You often enjoy hosting and going to parties, gossip, familial interaction, and other types of activities that value or emphasize socialization. - SF

Creepy-Diana · 10-28-2009, 01:11 AM

.

**717495** · 10-28-2009, 01:22 AM

Stop thinking so much and take the test.

Originally Posted by Azeroffs

It's easier said than done.

No, you just have to take the test and stop thinking so much. Use your hunches, stop pretending that you're more than a personality type, or you'll spend an hour on this thing and still be unsure. All you are to this thing is a personality type, remember that.

**717495** · 10-28-2009, 01:28 AM

Tereg I thought you were INFj or ENFp. How did you get INTp?

**Logos** · 10-28-2009, 04:22 AM

I finally took the test:

Your socionics type is LII-1Ne (INTj).
Other possible types:
ILE (78% as likely as LII)
EII (65% as likely as LII)
LIE (60% as likely as LII)

**tereg** · 10-28-2009, 04:38 AM

Originally Posted by polikujm

Tereg I thought you were INFj or ENFp. How did you get INTp?

*shrug* I answered the questions honestly.

**Marie84** · 10-28-2009, 05:14 AM

I like the new test better as it allows a degree to your answers

Your socionics type is EII-0 (INFj).
Other possible types:
IEI (82% as likely as EII)
LII (70% as likely as EII)
IEE (69% as likely as EII)

Quadra: Delta
Club: Humanitarian
Romance Styles:
Primary: Infantile (78%)
Secondary: Aggressor (22%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Fi 36 36
2. Ne 39 39
3. Ti 14 14
4. Se 11 11

Vital Block
5. Te 14 36
6. Si 11 39
7. Fe 36 14
8. Ni 39 11
IM Pathways
1. Fi-->Ne (56%)
2. Ti-->Ne (22%)
3. Fi-->Se (16%)
4. Ti-->Se (6%)

Ideal Partner: LSE-0 (ESTj)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Te 36 36
2. Si 39 39
3. Fe 14 14
4. Ni 11 11

Vital Block
5. Fi 14 36
6. Ne 11 39
7. Ti 36 14
8. Se 39 11

**xkj220** · 10-28-2009, 03:18 PM

The test has improved, imho.

It has been very helpful because it has made me realize that people have two different romance styles; their main style (which is composed of the result the combination of ego functions brings) and a secondary style which is that of their super-ego. Thanks for that.

**Socionics Is A Cult** · 10-28-2009, 03:30 PM

Originally Posted by xkj220

The test has improved, imho.

It has been very helpful because it has made me realize that people have two different romance styles; their main style (which is composed of the result the combination of ego functions brings) and a secondary style which is that of their super-ego. Thanks for that.

oh, I'd think that's highly contentious, as are those IM pathway percentages.

(But yeah, it's a decent test...although like most tests, it's all too easy to engineer a result)

**tereg** · 10-28-2009, 03:40 PM

Originally Posted by Subterranean

(But yeah, it's a decent test...although like most tests, it's all too easy to engineer a result)

Based on the results, I would say that this is not really the case.

**sema sahin** · 10-28-2009, 03:41 PM

Your socionics type is EIE-1Ni (ENFj).

Other possible types:
LIE (95% as likely as EIE)
EII (87% as likely as EIE)
ESE (83% as likely as EIE)

Quadra: Beta
Club: Humanitarian
Romance Styles:
Primary: Victim (82%)
Secondary: Caregiver (18%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Fe 34 34
2. Ni 41 41
3. Te 16 16
4. Si 9 9

Vital Block
5. Ti 16 34
6. Se 9 41
7. Fi 34 16
8. Ne 41 9

IM Pathways
1. Fe-->Ni (56%)
2. Te-->Ni (26%)
3. Fe-->Si (12%)
4. Te-->Si (6%)

Ideal Partner: LSI-1Se (ISTj)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ti 34 34
2. Se 41 41
3. Fi 16 16
4. Ne 9 9

Vital Block
5. Fe 16 34
6. Ni 9 41
7. Te 34 16
8. Si 41 9

I think it's quite interesting that my ideal parter came out as ISTj...considering I am married to an INTp. He's incredibly disorganized...and can get so caught up in things things that he often forgets to take care of himself. This is something I have to constanstly remind him about, which is something I certainly don't mind and actually enjoy. He can be inconsiderate at times, but certainly without realizing it...He's incredibly sweet though and treats me very well.

**tereg** · 10-28-2009, 03:44 PM

I might have figured out why I got INTp

Originally Posted by RSV3

The test isn't working in all some browsers like Firefox, so that could be the problem; I'm working on fixing this.

I will take the test in Internet Explorer

**tereg** · 10-28-2009, 04:03 PM

I took it again, this time in IE

Your socionics type is ILI-1Te (INTp).
Other possible types:
LII (80% as likely as ILI)
SLI (76% as likely as ILI)
EII (74% as likely as ILI)

Quadra: Gamma
Club: Researcher
Romance Styles:
Primary: Victim (70%)
Secondary: Caregiver (30%)

Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Ni 35 35
2. Te 40 40
3. Si 15 15
4. Fe 10 10

Vital Block
5. Se 15 35
6. Fi 10 40
7. Ne 35 15
8. Ti 40 10
IM Pathways
1. Ni-->Te (56%)
2. Si-->Te (24%)
3. Ni-->Fe (14%)
4. Si-->Fe (6%)

Ideal Partner: SEE-1Fi (ESFp)
Function Strength (%) Value ( %)

Mental Block
1. Se 35 35
2. Fi 40 40
3. Ne 15 15
4. Ti 10 10

Vital Block
5. Ni 15 35
6. Te 10 40
7. Si 35 15
8. Fe 40 10

**Simon Ssmall** · 10-28-2009, 05:03 PM

Originally Posted by Mimosa Pudica

Not "too hard to answer". Rather that I"m often both sides or none. The options often aren"t mutually exclusive, and then how can I chose an answer? It"s like answering this:
What descrkibes you better:
a - you know how to talk
b - you know how to walk

I am aware what you had in mind, as I quite often have the same problem. However I don't think it is tests fault, but rather self-perception. Seeing oneself as multidimensional or in different situations differently is a problem for a test as there is no way it could account for that. Id say this tests gives more options than most, for example this test gives even sliders which is way more than most do. Downside of course is the fact I had to lie to get to the next phase of the test as it seems I was inconsistent with my answers. Either way it wasn't actually a negative remark, just an observation that I noticed you answer the same way at most tests.

**Satan** · 10-28-2009, 06:42 PM

Originally Posted by Mimosa Pudica

Not "too hard to answer". Rather that I"m often both sides or none. The options often aren"t mutually exclusive, and then how can I chose an answer? It"s like answering this:
What descrkibes you better:
a - you know how to talk
b - you know how to walk

Do you talk the walk, or walk the talk.

**717495** · 10-28-2009, 06:59 PM

So you disagree with the material displayed on the test in its relevance to Socionics.

**jason_m** · 10-28-2009, 07:08 PM

Originally Posted by MysticSonic

I answered honestly.

The test told me to lie.

Interesting. I lied and the test told me to be more honest. (Or maybe to lie even more than I did...)

Jason

**Logos** · 10-28-2009, 07:24 PM

Originally Posted by Mimosa Pudica

Not "too hard to answer". Rather that I"m often both sides or none. The options often aren"t mutually exclusive, and then how can I chose an answer? It"s like answering this:
What descrkibes you better:
a - you know how to talk
b - you know how to walk

Thankfully the test is not on a 5-point Likert scale, so if you so desire you can keep the scroll cursor in the middle. This is not quite as either or as you make it out to be. :wink:

**marooned** · 10-28-2009, 09:26 PM

Right, but when you leave too many in the middle it screws things up (I tend to leave too many in the middle).

**RSV3** · 10-28-2009, 09:36 PM

Originally Posted by Loki

Right, but when you leave too many in the middle it screws things up (I tend to leave too many in the middle).

Each slider has a range from -50 to 50 (default middle is 0), so yes, where each slider is placed is very relevant to your results.

**marooned** · 10-28-2009, 09:38 PM

I do think it's a pretty good test as far as tests go.

**RSV3** · 10-28-2009, 09:41 PM

Originally Posted by Loki

I do think it's a pretty good test as far as tests go.

Thanks

Thread: New socionics test- this one gives subtypes

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions