jxrtes will be analyzing the crap outta that, or so he says.
Basically, ask him. He's the dunce responsible for this.
jxrtes will be analyzing the crap outta that, or so he says.
Basically, ask him. He's the dunce responsible for this.
This makes perfect sense because I supervise you.
make me brownies now.
The end is nigh
Ok, I can't do it. Stupid need for the unhindered flow of accurate information! Bah!
Still, jxrtes should be getting that Alpha SF analysis.
I can give it a go with an argument for ESE, since you asked for it.
Other than the fact that quite a few Alpha NTs are in awe of your Fe...
I remember you saying on stickam that you have a hard time accounting for all the facts with a single system when building different conceptual frameworks.
Your history of type change also points to this as evidence IMO, where you've shown an extreme willingness to completely switch your type over very minor details that seem inconsistent with type descriptions or other conceptualizations.
This all points to weak Ti, in particular -Ti.
In type and function descriptions, LIIs are described as creating universally valid systems. Essentially, they try to generate systems that account for all the facts or possibilities. LIIs can not only explain away minor inconsistencies, but also freely generate their own novel interpretations that cancel out such inconsistencies.
^ This seems to be your DS, since you've had conflict with other forumites for dogmatically providing you explanations that don't necessarily cancel out the other possibilities.
Also fwiw,
The difference between +Ti and -Ti is the difference between Ne and Se egos. LSIs are described as selecting the best of the available systems, essentially being more interested in choosing which facts or possibilities are important and ignoring the ones that aren't.
I think, in general, -Ti is more exploratory and inductive, whereas +Ti is more pragmatic and deductive.
I can't yet tell how much you use Ne tbh, so I can't "rule out" any N type, but I'm pretty confident in my suggestion.
p.s.
Regarding Jake I can possibly see some irrational Alpha type for him, because of your persistent online interaction / possible friendly-ish rivalry.
p.p.s.
I think you are C subtype in the DCNH system.
Last edited by xerx; 10-08-2009 at 09:30 PM. Reason: corrected some muddled text
Well, sure. But a fair amount of SLIs like me too. Likewise with the ILEs... and then there's spoon-san... etc. You can't all be my duals! (Unfortunately )
eh, whatever type you are, I'm cool with it. I think my roommate is a ESE 6w7 and he could easily be confused with IEE, and he hangs out with deltas all the time. He doesn't know how to do anything, I swear. He wants me to tell him how to do EVERYTHING it's so annoying. If I don't help him, he just sits there and moves from the computer to the TV to the xbox, to some other random form of entertainment. I've come to the conclusion that he can't think on his own. I took him to get indian food once, but I decided to go to a different restaurant than what he's used to and he FLIPPED THE FUCK OUT.
The saddest ESFj
...
N ?jxrtes: feel free to give me your opinion.
SEI, as I have said all along. Small chance of ESE.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I haven't subtyped myself for the last year, since I've been trying to evaluate various approaches but thanks for the input.
ps. I'm not really very friendly. It's just a skill I learned to use so I can talk more easily to people.
If something happened to a close friend, I wouldn't mind risking my life for him/her, but that's more about passion than friendliness.
the hat avatar makes you seem friendly.