Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Pet peeve about subtypes

  1. 03-07-2006, 08:48 AM #1
    Smilingeyes
    Smilingeyes is offline
    Smilingeyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,228
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Pet peeve about subtypes

    It pisses me off when I find a socionist who claims there are no subtypes and then read the type descriptions s/he uses only to find out s/he lumps eg. intuitive-type INFj and intuitive-type INTj together and calls that INFj and likewise calls ethical style INFjs ISFjs.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-07-2006, 06:34 PM #2
    Ave
    Ave is offline
    Now I'm down in it Ave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    6,083
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, thats kind of like it pisses me off when socionists give a description of INTPs closer to the logical subtype and claim this is the standard behavior, while describing intuitive type INTjs as standard intjs and logical subtype intjs as intps.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules