-
Pet peeve about subtypes
It pisses me off when I find a socionist who claims there are no subtypes and then read the type descriptions s/he uses only to find out s/he lumps eg. intuitive-type INFj and intuitive-type INTj together and calls that INFj and likewise calls ethical style INFjs ISFjs.
-
divine, too human
Yeah, thats kind of like it pisses me off when socionists give a description of INTPs closer to the logical subtype and claim this is the standard behavior, while describing intuitive type INTjs as standard intjs and logical subtype intjs as intps.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules