Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Pet peeve about subtypes

  1. #1
    Smilingeyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,228
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Pet peeve about subtypes

    It pisses me off when I find a socionist who claims there are no subtypes and then read the type descriptions s/he uses only to find out s/he lumps eg. intuitive-type INFj and intuitive-type INTj together and calls that INFj and likewise calls ethical style INFjs ISFjs.

  2. #2
    Uncle Ave ipbanned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Belgium
    TIM
    LSI-C
    Posts
    5,656
    Mentioned
    220 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, thats kind of like it pisses me off when socionists give a description of INTPs closer to the logical subtype and claim this is the standard behavior, while describing intuitive type INTjs as standard intjs and logical subtype intjs as intps.
    L'āme a ses raisons que la raison ne connaīt point

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •