Overlooked mistypings

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Enters Laughing]

This is your problem: I used 1/14k format from the first place, you knew what it was all about, in the end the chances are the same indifferent on the notation.
But you derailed the subject with ambiguities on purpose just to avoid admitting that I was right.

No I didn't. I still think I was right in that thread (in regards to the natural world). It's just that you presumed I was wrong with my intrepretation of what "14k to 1" meant - it does not mean 14k over 1.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Slacker]

I give it a 75% chance that you're both mistyped.

[Slacker]

Ok, I think Pinocchio is some Ti type, though not necessarily ILE. But that's possible.

I think the other one is probably an Fe type? Or maybe an Fi type but not ESI - it would be creative Fi instead of leading Fi because the Fe is stronger than in someone with leading Fi. Those of us with creative Fi have pretty strong Fe. He doesn't seem ESI to me. SEE maybe. Men who are SEE often mistype themselves because they erroneously think SEEs are by definition slutty girls.

But I still think you could both very well be mistyped.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request