Results 1 to 40 of 56

Thread: Socionics and evolution

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,072
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1981slater View Post
    Tracking the Elusive Human, Vol. 2

    Tracking, Vol. 2, Part III, Chapter 8

    This is related to MBTI, apparently.

    Top, extroverted logic. Left, extroverted sensing. Right, introverted intuition.

    So... LXEs have good bodies, IXIs are skinny, and SXEs are fat? This does not seem like a very good theory.
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  2. #2
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,684
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    From whence sprang the assumption that Alphas and Gammas have higher IQs?
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  3. #3
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,315
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    It's a good theory.

  4. #4
    norph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    TIM
    NotINotNNotFNotj
    Posts
    172
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have a pretty extreme view on this topic, but I believe there is no relationship whatsoever between physiognomy and personality, including socionics.

  5. #5
    Breaking stereotypes Suz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    On a chatbox diet
    TIM
    ESI maybe
    Posts
    6,479
    Mentioned
    173 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    It's a good theory.
    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    I'm going to have to say at that too.
    Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,843
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    With a topic like evolution you need to use evidence, not blind speculation. Even the most rudimentary claims in this thread are baseless, and this whole thing's a big skip. Another good example of an ILE seeing a possibility and running with it, except he keeps running and runs off into the middle of the desert, and doesn't realize where he's gotten. Maritsa, you are the 2nd worst impersonation of a scientist I have ever known.

  7. #7
    Imagine Timeless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    San Francisco, CA.
    TIM
    ILE/ENTp
    Posts
    817
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Lightbulb

    My prediction for the evolution of Socionics:



    Alpha:

    Future ILEs:


    Future SEIs:


    Future ESEs:


    Future LIIs:



    ---


    Beta:

    Future SLEs:


    Future IEIs:


    Future EIEs:


    Future LSIs



    ---


    Gamma:

    Future SEEs:


    Future ILIs:


    Future LIEs:


    Future ESIs:



    ---


    Delta:

    Future SLIs:


    Future IEEs:


    Future EIIs:


    Future LSEs:


  8. #8
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,315
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    timeless, that was hilarious! i had to go back and see who posted that. I thought it was slater, lol

  9. #9
    :popcorn: Capitalist Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,261
    Mentioned
    167 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol gamma has a monopoly on hot chicks

  10. #10
    The Looks stanprollyright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    In your pants
    TIM
    IEE-Ne cp 6w7 sx/so
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Timeless View Post
    [CENTER]My prediction for the evolution of Socionics:
    Future IEEs:
    I resent that.
    Stan is not my real name.

  11. #11
    Breaking stereotypes Suz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    On a chatbox diet
    TIM
    ESI maybe
    Posts
    6,479
    Mentioned
    173 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol @ the IEE pic!


    I see that delta has the cutest creatures!

    Well, with the exception of the SEI
    Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx

  12. #12
    Breaking stereotypes Suz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    On a chatbox diet
    TIM
    ESI maybe
    Posts
    6,479
    Mentioned
    173 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stanprollyright View Post
    I resent that.
    LOL this is making me CRACK UP!
    Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx

  13. #13
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,315
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stanprollyright View Post
    I resent that.
    Is this one better?




  14. #14
    Executor MatthewZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    TIM
    Ne-LII
    Posts
    794
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd like to dispute the article in the OP. History has shown interbreeding within an elite upper class creates weak, genetically homogeneous individuals, not a class that has all of the genetic strengths of humanity. I also find the notion of predicting anything about human society in the next 100,000 years completely laughable. With the current rate of information expansion, assuming that the same variable present in today's society will be the only variables present in society 100,000 years from now (if it even exists then) is preposterous. Minus genetic differences, will genes even matter then? Who's to say humans won't as as much artificial machine as flesh by then?
    Last edited by MatthewZ; 08-05-2010 at 07:51 AM. Reason: I need to sleep more when posting

  15. #15
    Breaking stereotypes Suz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    On a chatbox diet
    TIM
    ESI maybe
    Posts
    6,479
    Mentioned
    173 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Timeless View Post
    [CENTER]My prediction for the evolution of Socionics:





    Future SEIs:

    AWWW look at it's little frowny face!!
    Some unpleasant Si going on????

    Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •