I think it corresponds to the creative function actually, like a lot of things. Irrational Betas typically like Alphas more, rational Betas typically like Gammas more. I'm generally the same way.
I think it corresponds to the creative function actually, like a lot of things. Irrational Betas typically like Alphas more, rational Betas typically like Gammas more. I'm generally the same way.
No kidding at all, I am more comfortable long term with Gamma in general than with Alpha, LIE my look-a-like, some unhealthy one can be such an ass but if the healthy one when I get close with them, I don't feel as if I have to watch what I say compare to ESE. No question asked how comfortable I would be if I compare ILI with SEI for me as I don't think I would want to be supervised and take the constant . ISFj although the relationship are straining as time goes, I feel more calm with them and I can relax easily with them, with LII, its a HIGH and then a low....(arguing can arise), With ENTp and ESFp it will depend on the person.
Could this also be related to sub-type?
I am EII-Fi, I socialize more with Gammas and have my whole life, with a couple of Alphas in the mix.
EII
4w5, sp/sx
IEI, and I probably have more Alpha friends than Gammas, although my Gamma friends are closer than the Alphas.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I mix between Alphas and Deltas, though I work with a whole bunch of Gamma, and every once in a while hang out with them.
it really depends. i like delta more if i'm getting drunk or high and being an asshole, which is pretty fun, but usually our sense of humor is limited to laughing at somethings expense (ISTps) and discussions get somewhat boring after a while. ENFp/ISTp is easier to talk to in that case. For beta, it's ESTp/INFp. Beta has more interesting discussions, can enjoy more petty fucked up things like wrecking the neighbors snowman or watching jerry springer, and can laugh at absurdity.. which can be entertaining
Last edited by crazedrat; 08-08-2009 at 08:10 PM.
Crazedrat, you sound very anti-social.
LIE-Ni, i think, but maybe ILI
Deltas
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
It can go either way, depends on the individual
Gammas are easier to talk to, especially in regards to serious issues, but they're a bit too...harsh I guess
Alphas are more comforting to be around since they're generally more excepting and enjoy Ne/Si playfulness, but I can't connect with them beyond superficial matters
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
I usually find myself with Deltas.This has more to do with my circumstances than my preferences... I've spent little enough time with Beta that I don't know from experience which I'd prefer.
I might go with what Hkkmr said... "Deltas are more tolerable, but Betas are more fun."
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
Theoretically it should depend on the valued information elements:
irrational:
Apha and Delta:
Beta and Gamma:
rational:
Alpha and Beta:
Gamma and Delta:
I think it is a bit more complicated and also depends on subtypes.
In general I like Deltas - except of some LSEs.
In general I can't stand EIEs, LSIs and SLEs - but there are exceptions depending on subtypes.
Ni-INTj --- Harmonizing Analyst --- -
DCNH rox
The only Gammas I know hang around Delta groups.
So, Alphas