Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Ability to tell how much time has passed without looking at your watch

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wittmont View Post
    Bah, it's fuzzy socionics "logics", I specifically told you Te guys not to take my example of fields and objects too literally lol. Don't ruin my perfectly valid rant by going techniqual darnit!!! lol
    I know, I wouldn't have said otherwise. But it's related to everything you've said.

    Basically in your mind it's along the lines been:"We need better Te-descriptions, not this inaccurate Te"

    But really your criticism is:"These Ti-descriptions are poor, we need Te-descriptions".

    So I basically agree with your criticism, but the problem is not Te
    ...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.

    INTp

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    907
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mimosa Pudica View Post
    Te is dynamic. He wants things to stand still. I know him. :tongue:
    Bah I am Ni dynamic and Fe dynamic, which means I percieve reality in 64 frames per second (according to one of Reinin's dichotomies), maybe it is 2 x 64 = 128 frames per second since both of my leading functions are dynamic . No wonder IEI's are 'goofy' with that spin going on. Ofc I need some solid static Ti to slow me down. (Impeccable IEI logic there).
    INFp

    If your sea chart does not match reality, go with reality (Old mariner saying)



  3. #3
    Angel of Lightning Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Utah
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,235
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wittmont View Post
    Bah I am Ni dynamic and Fe dynamic, which means I percieve reality in 64 frames per second (according to one of Reinin's dichotomies), maybe it is 2 x 64 = 128 frames per second since both of my leading functions are dynamic . No wonder IEI's are 'goofy' with that spin going on. Ofc I need some solid static Ti to slow me down. (Impeccable IEI logic there).
    Everyone with at least one ego-block dynamic function has two. No need to double it.



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •