I gots me a video!

[Cone]

Some of my own observations:

- Generally unwavering, stays in one position throughout the entire video
- Limited facial expression
- Love the permanent smile!
- Doesn't feel the need to fill in silence, i.e. you like to think about what you are going to say rather than "thinking out loud"
- Most of what you say comes out seeming well thought out (whether it is or not) and coherent without a lot of interjections (like "um's" and "like's") and without many or any tangents
- Talk about Socionics seems to concentrate on how things fit together logically

So, yeah, I think that fits well with the IJ temperament and leading , specifically LII, if I am remembering correctly what Rick said about them.

[Jonathan]

I would tend to agree...The discussion really talks about how things are supposed to work based on the consequences of the system. In contrast, perhaps a Gamma, while being aware of all that stuff, may not be as inclined to explain how that's all supposed to work, and might instead point out a few things to criticize or apply. Regarding the general manner of speaking, that's not definitive, as both LIIs and ILIs may talk very slowly and calmly like that. But the sense of how it's organized, as if there's a sort of internal "book" and one is turning the page mentally, may speak for Ij temperament and LII.

The caveat though is that a lot of people will seem Ti-focused if they're creating a video about the basics of Socionics. I think a lot of people in daily life may be very different from that but if they decided to lecture about Socionics, that might make them appear LII at that moment.

I'm not saying that this is a reason say that LII is wrong here. It's just something to consider.

[Krig the Viking]

I agree with everyone else. Your discussion of socionics was logical, abstract, and generalized, heavy on theory and light on specific examples (Ti+Ne). Your reasons for studying socionics were: it's interesting, there's more to it than MBTI, and it's more nuanced. In other words, it's a complex system you enjoy learning and understanding for its own sake rather than any practical application (Ti>Te). Like Numbers said, I see no reason to contradict your self-typing.

[Nexus]

lol, you called PoLR 'polar'; sometimes I like to pronounce it pole-'R' :tongue:

you seem very alpha NT; definitely / valuing; I think you are Ne-INTj personally