Is this ILI-INTp description accurate for you?

[Hugo]

Anyhow, that description is not INTp, as supported by Cone (INTp).

I did not say that. It is very INTp. I am only against these types of descriptions because they often miss things and exaggerate others. For example, someone awhile back wrote an ENTj description, and I could only find one negative trait out of a whole mess of positive ones.

That's strange because you said you cannot identify yourself with the intp description in question. So how can it be very INTp. Unless you are suggesting you are not INTp.