Subjective is between the observer and the object. Thats what it means lol.
Perception of the space between two objects is an objective analysis. The space would exist regardless of human perception.
I already gave my reasoning for what subjective means in the context of socionics (and in everything else for that matter), so if you disagree fine.
eh its not really. Just more correct
True, however I really think its obvious. I mean sure, I didn't exactly do an srs and choose a p value lol, but I would think you could start reviewing other people besides the ones I listed yourself and begin to see the pattern.
I wouln't expect you too. You're a 3w4. Generally more socially oriented, more interested in the quick benefits of social interaction. I think its generally us 5's who partake in world building. It makes sense to that starfall (4w5) and bnd (6w5) would be prone to such day dreaming.
Not sure about CS Lewis (probably Alpha), but yes there are of course Ni/Se fantasy writers! (add Neil Gaiman to that list). Different type of fantasy though. which I see you've noticed below:
Yes Tolkein is ISTp or INTj I can't decide which.
Hah yes Se is detailed interested too!
But its in a totally different way. For Si, the details must make the observer feel as if the story fits together cohesively. Like how Tolkein goes to great effort to detail the lineages and landscapes of Arda, JK Rowling all the nooks and crannies of hogwarts (fuck this is making me want to read). But even if shit is crazy like dragons and unicorns or w/e the fuck what matters is that the tide of events and storyline is based in a concrete... gestalt I guess.
Whereas people like Neil Gaiman just make shit happen outta no where and it makes no sense unless you relate it to the Ni context of the story. Then all the seemingly unrelated events are tied together.
DaVinci's concern with anatomical correctness and precise illustrations, are more like the photo-realistic style of external object statics. Si valuers don't really care about that because the context and "playing field" ("story line") is what must be detailed and sensible whilst the objects can be module and even haphazard.
Uhg, I know the theory and please stop with the pseudo-badass facade. Its kinda baby-ish and silly. I feel you project alot onto me that i really don't deserve. I just wanna discuss shit with you, but you have to make it into a battle. It feels forced and unecessary.