Blank acceptance also promotes sloth, complete boredom, and the tendency to not do anything other than sustain your physical existence, which I think is extremely depressing.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Alright if Niffweed is LII why do so many of his posts come off as describing concrete processes in a non static but dynamic sort of way? I say that points ILI, not LII if anything.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Mmmmmm sloth
I think this is typical of all Ni types. We tend to get blinded by someone with strong Se, its easy to see someone else doing it, hard to stop doing it(not that there any reason to ) and seems to annoy the hell out of everyone else who sees it, as my ESFj friend says about my reltionship with my gf "i hate to see you being controlled".
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
I guess I'm just not seeing the same thing Carla, Typhon, and glamourama are in that regard. What I've read of his serious posts, few though they are, has a high content of static logic, and it's even more apparent in actual conversation with him.
Easy. He knows socionics and tries to.
Not only does it come off as extremely forced and unnatural, but having interacted with him irl, I couldn't tell you with straight face that he's dynamic.
Every point he makes comes down like a block and he's just adding the blocks together as he goes along.
This is what I think.
This is what things are.
This is how things should be.
Which is fine to me because thats how I think and speak.
yah static rational, not dynamic irrational.
The end is nigh
I'd also like to add, why bother pretending to be a type you're not?
Logic fail, Yake. Your argument basically says that anyone who knows socionics is untypable... and then worse! You go on to type one specific instance.
No one is perfect. Also it doesn't have to be conscious.
Nope.
That's why I said it comes across as "forced and unnatural" hence my typing him based on what I actually saw him doing.
And there are plenttttyyytyytytytytytyty of reasons to trick yourself into being a type. Even desire to be consistent with other systems can do it.
The end is nigh
Yes, something you saw him doing.
You can claim to see anyone doing anything to make up evidence for whatever you're trying to sell. But now I'm starting to sound as nihilistic as you.
Much like how you refuse to be any sort of Ni-base because of your Unfortunate Past?
People can understand Socionics but have poor self-awareness and therefore type themselves incorrectly.
Sorry for assuming that your presence in this thread indicates a desire to find an answer.
Hmmm, maybe I should go post in the "How Many Warts Does The Average American Male Named Peter Have On His Dick" thread. I sure as hell don't care, but it would be really fun to harass some people who have friends named Peter and accuse them of having motivations that are in no way represented by the way they post in order to appear controversial and inflammatory in a topic that I have secondary involvement in by way of wanting to side with my spouse, because she's a brainless nitwit who can't convince anyone of anything without me standing behind her holding a broken tree branch.
But I'm not very good at discerning people's intentions ...oh well, by my calculations it will be approximately as fun as donning a diving bell and pumping raw sewage into the air line nonetheless, and hey, if things get boring, I can always go back to my 24/7/365 vacation! Man, it sure rules to be a suburban white boy who never grew up!
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Alright, back into retirement I go. I've said what I wanted to say. Not to worry though, if I ever decide that I miss the toxicity of this place, I'll be back.
Uninformed about facts to the point of comedy? Check.
At least three different straw man arguments? Check.
Manic, irrational behavior directed at someone (Joy, in this case; shamelessly using her as a tool to attack me) who hasn't said or done anything to you? Check.
Clear demonstration of a lack of understanding of people in general? Check.
Yep, an authentic George post.
Claiming to have "facts" without actually saying anything? Check.
Using "straw man" as a buzzword against an unabashedly ad hominem attack to try and boost credibility? Check
Accusing people of poor mental health to discredit what they say? Check.
Being condescending about other people's interpersonal intelligence in an attempt to belittle them without proving anything? Check.
A classic discojoe post.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I could and exactly.
I don't refuse lol. And my unfortunate past had little to do with some anti-Ni realization. I had been holding out on typing Alpha NT because I thought I was in a dual relationship with an Se ESFp. Turns out her feelings were nothing like I had expected (she lied because she felt bad/didn't want to lose me as a friend). Also during the end of it she revealed her Fi motivations and I could not handle it. It baffled me and I realized what polr hits feel like in relationships. Also now that I have hindsight and can be more fair about our interactions, we have little in common and our world views are totally opposite. I have however, made up with her and her Ni INTp bf and we're cool now.
This is not a matter of me having some biased attachment to ENTp. Its because it actually fits in even the stereotypical descriptions and the people I do dualize with are ISFp's.
That's what I mean.
No I meant more like he thinks there should be a closer correlation between enneagram and socionics than actually exists for instance.
(that had nothing to do with model x, I meant different typological systems)
No I would not put it that way.
I do.
The end is nigh
emotional stuntedness/phobicness, obsessive privacy, and knowledge accumulation are traits of the 5 fixation.
Guess how Niff describes Fe and Te lol
loud emotional display (often among groups) for Fe and accumulation of information for Te.
I love accumulating information/knowledge and I'm often scared shitless around emotional display. I also happen to be a 6w5.
So perhaps his 5-ishness has influenced his understanding of socionics?
Is it possible Carla?
Is it that unreasonable?
The end is nigh
I'm sure there are many INTps throughout history who did things that were "highly abstract with no application to real life."
A fly-tip has 'structure'...but that doesn't necessarily make it a 'planned' structure. I think the difference between the two is important. INTjs and INTps both consider things over a long period of time, so they both have a central bank of ponderings that may or may not seem structured to you.
I think I said that wrong.
I don't think he's purposefully faking it. Also i don't think he actually comes across as an INTp (imo).
So I don't even think he's being a faker I take it back.
I do however believe he is limiting himself in certain ways.
Although I have my personal beliefs as to what might be motivating his self imposed limitations I will not say here out of respect.
The end is nigh
It's interesting to note that some of the Alphas were for the most part the only ones who responded by saying things along the lines of: they think the things he says are worthwhile, they understand where he's coming from, they easily get along with him, etc. (Betas and Deltas mostly responded with, "He's okay, but I need to moderate what I say around him in order to get along with him".)
A negativist LIE with a disdain for Se?
How does niffweed disdain Se?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I in all sincerity can't see a hint of Ti, when you look at it as a technical approach to ideas and explanations. He's pretty unconversant with Ti systems of thought still. I would actually assume EII over LII, since LII is just kind of pointless. ILI looks like the best choice though.
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
niff is ILI, though I wish I could say otherwise
I don't necessarily see him as "not an ethical type," even though I am sincere in thinking he is ILI. I just am certain he's not an "Fe type," or an Fe valuer for that matter. Past circumstance should make that clear.
you do not remember correctly. I have always known he was ILI. There may of been a time when I didn't go against someone saying he was LII because it was in my own interests to subdue or belittle him.. not sure
Delta
Model X Will Save Us!
*randomwarelinkremoved
wow, overload ...I assume you're being facetious...anyway, if you doubt that Niffweed is -creating look at his subjective (or rather objective) impressions list; they are all extremely in content and in expression...
IMHO he is a regular honore de ballsack (j/k)
lmao
+1
Last edited by Nexus; 08-06-2009 at 11:41 PM.
fwiw, the list you put down, names such as XoX, isha, implied, may not actually be INTp, and, crucially perhaps, are you sure that they "get on" with Niffweed?
It's also worth noting that doesn't necessarily make a case for him being ILI, as plenty types can spot an Ni type, and spot them well.And I'm not sure who the two other ILIs who don't like him. Not that it's my business or my concern, but I just never noticed it. That's all I am saying. But I merely wanted to make a point that for him to be good at spotting Ni leading types makes me think that LII as his type seems a bit odd and contradictory.
--------------------------
As perhaps a random observation, I found the drama of this somewhat interesting:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...his-forum.html
There's nothing particularly UN in DiscoJoes post. He's making an assessment of Niffweed that by all accounts can be related to , and it's delivery is through . Basically, Discojoe has observed Niffweed being "nasty" to other people, and delivers his response accordingly, on an inter-personal level, and punishing the wrong-doer if you will.
It's not my cup of tea per se - I should say - on a personal level, I agree and can understand what discojoe is saying, but I would appreciate the Fi going into something with options of potential and how to change rather than out and out punishment (but that's likely my preference because I'm an valuer, not an valuer).
The point is, why is Niffweed so against his own valued functions of Se & Fi? That instead of taking on board what DiscoJoe is saying, he simply kicks him out of the forum, proclaiming him to be an "asshole" or something? (can't remember the exact words, but that's the jist of it).
No that's not really the case, there's others also, he also doubted (well not just doubted) SeFi's joining the board having their types right, at that time. He has later retyped them. How distastefully he treated Liveandletlive at that time, without any reason, is the only problem I've had with Niffweed (from my point of view).
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp