VI Me please

[BlackCat]

So I've identified myself as ESI after a lot of soul searching and research, but I'm curious about what you people VI me as.

EDIT: Keep in mind I'm actually trying to smile in these pictures.

[1981slater]

Sensory-ethical-introvert

[Park]

Actually, I would have VI'd you as Alpha. SEI or even SLI, Matt Groening subtype.

[ArchonAlarion]

*Data integrated*
*Parameters set*
*All systems go*

ENFp, ISFp, ISTp, ENFp, ISFp???, ENFp, Ne Ne Ni, Si Ne, Se? No Ne, Si Fi Fi Fi, Ti? No ENFp ENFp ENFp ENFp ENFp ENFp ENFp Fi Fi ENFp Irrationality ENFp Infantile Infantile Infantile ENFp INFj? No irrational ENFp ENFp 1110101011010000101010010101010000101010100101010

*Ding*

Type: Fi ENFp

Broad sets: Infantile>Caregiver, Alpha-Delta, Ne/Si, Irrational

Alternate: ISFp, ISTp, INFj, ENTp

[Mattie]

*Data integrated*
*Parameters set*
*All systems go*

ENFp, ISFp, ISTp, ENFp, ISFp???, ENFp, Ne Ne Ni, Si Ne, Se? No Ne, Si Fi Fi Fi, Ti? No ENFp ENFp ENFp ENFp ENFp ENFp ENFp Fi Fi ENFp Irrationality ENFp Infantile Infantile Infantile ENFp INFj? No irrational ENFp ENFp 1110101011010000101010010101010000101010100101010

*Ding*

Type: Fi ENFp

Broad sets: Infantile>Caregiver, Alpha-Delta, Ne/Si, Irrational

Alternate: ISFp, ISTp, INFj, ENTp

lol Cute

I can't say I disagree with your self-typing on a purely VI place, but I'm not sure if I really sense the from the pictures you've provided. I've been acquainted with an FiSe who has a somewhat similar look to you, but there's a very clear show of . I do think you seem > , so I'm going to guess FiNe. Concerning the SiFe guesses, most of the SiFe I know can smile pretty easily and have a generally wide smile. This could easily be a superficial generalization though. Maybe once we learn more about you, we can get a better picture of your type

[BlackCat]

I can't say I disagree with your self-typing on a purely VI place, but I'm not sure if I really sense the from the pictures you've provided. I've been acquainted with an FiSe who has a somewhat similar look to you, but there's a very clear show of . I do think you seem > , so I'm going to guess FiNe. Concerning the SiFe guesses, most of the SiFe I know can smile pretty easily and have a generally wide smile. This could easily be a superficial generalization though. Maybe once we learn more about you, we can get a better picture of your type

I initially thought I was an EII, but I couldn't relate to POLR Se whatsoever. This just really doesn't click with me-

EIIs are typically negligent of their surroundings and have difficulty keeping track of objects or constantly monitoring things and people around them.

They can be passive and self-absorbed, often preferring to wait for things to happen rather than make them happen. As such, they tend to have quite a number of lost opportunities. To a certain extent, EIIs can be oblivious to hints from someone who is romantically interested in them. Therefore, this gives the other party the wrong impression that they are not interested in them.

Outsiders often think the EII is oblivious to reality because they will often neglect basic needs. Although it is by no means necessary, this may also manifest itself as a general rejection or aversion to violence or force as a means or way of life.

Not at all.

I do relate to ego Ne.

EIIs have a natural understanding of people's inner makeup and see what can be done with that makeup to bring them closer to ideals. EIIs have a very well-developed view of what people and relationships should be like and are able to help others reach those ideals.

EIIs understand people very well. They often give good advice, and have a strong understanding of the inner workings of even the most complicated minds. They have well developed ideas concerning ideal emotional states for individuals, and always have advice as to how an individual can reach that ideal.

I can relate to that very well... But I also relate to ego Se. I also relate to super ego Ne.

I'll just type some random stuff about decision making I suppose.

I see the possibilities in everything, but I think that things will definitely go wrong if I go off on a tangent. If I get unrealistic about a concrete situation... that's just no good. So I like to stay grounded in my decision making, I like to make the most realistic choice that I can think of. With the variables that already exist. I just simply think that it's the best thing to do. People often see Ne in me, but that's because we're talking about a theory here. I will get theoretical about a theory, but about real life situations I stick to my guns. I have learned in life (the hard way, via experience) that if you go off on a tangent, jump to conclusions, think of unrealistic possibilities, that this will just make things worse for you.

Surface value is something that every living being can relate to, and it's a good medium for decision making when it comes to people. If the possibilities presented by something at surface value don't add up, then I'll think about what the possible meaning behind the facts I have is. It will cause harm if you jump to conclusions in my opinion, meaning if you actually believe these conclusions. Everyone can be hopeful about something and imagine things that could happen, but it's nice to keep these things close at hand just in case something of that sort happens. Usually I have these conclusions mapped out in my head, ready for when something of that sort will happen.

Another thing to note is that I try to crush my weaknesses. I'm an enneagram 8w9, I try to make myself better, to be the strongest human being I can (mentally). My theory behind this is that I have improved on my weaknesses in POLR Ne (possibly), or in the case of EII, improved on my weaknesses in POLR Se. All of these typological theories, MBTI and socionics, have helped me realize my weaknesses and helped me improve on them. In MBTI I am an INFP. MBTI and socionics are different from each other... and it's to my understanding that your types can be different in each (as in as an INFP in MBTI I don't have to be INFj/EII in socionics).

[Mattie]

I initially thought I was an EII, but I couldn't relate to POLR Se whatsoever. This just really doesn't click with me-

Not at all.

I didn't really like that description, I don't think it's well written. Can anyone who knows a few FiNe or is a FiNe back up this description? I think a way you can also find out if belongs in your ego or not is to read more into the actual function , read about the -leading types, and see if you can draw comparisons to people like that in your life and see how that makes you feel.

I do relate to ego Ne.

I can relate to that very well... But I also relate to ego Se. I also relate to super ego Ne.

If you relate to the being in your ego, then definitely would not jive with you. Same way with them switched.. Maybe you can snoop around for FiNe topics? Or maybe read more descriptions about them, or talk about the functions themselves. I think that might actually be your type!

I'll just type some random stuff about decision making I suppose.

I see the possibilities in everything, but I think that things will definitely go wrong if I go off on a tangent. If I get unrealistic about a concrete situation... that's just no good. So I like to stay grounded in my decision making, I like to make the most realistic choice that I can think of. With the variables that already exist. I just simply think that it's the best thing to do. People often see Ne in me, but that's because we're talking about a theory here. I will get theoretical about a theory, but about real life situations I stick to my guns. I have learned in life (the hard way, via experience) that if you go off on a tangent, jump to conclusions, think of unrealistic possibilities, that this will just make things worse for you.

This could possibly be creative rather than being valued. What do you think?

Another thing to note is that I try to crush my weaknesses. I'm an enneagram 8w9, I try to make myself better, to be the strongest human being I can (mentally). My theory behind this is that I have improved on my weaknesses in POLR Ne (possibly), or in the case of EII, improved on my weaknesses in POLR Se. All of these typological theories, MBTI and socionics, have helped me realize my weaknesses and helped me improve on them. In MBTI I am an INFP. MBTI and socionics are different from each other... and it's to my understanding that your types can be different in each (as in as an INFP in MBTI I don't have to be INFj/EII in socionics).

This may not be type related, but I remember a couple of conversations about NeFi projecting this image of being "perfect," or always in a good mood and not showing personality flaws (this is generalizing), etc. Maybe the same happens with FiNe, just in a different manner? In both MBTI and Socionics I am an ENFP/NeFi, so there is some sort of correlation, but I'm not sure exactly what it is. How are you enjoying your foray into Socionics? Is it not as bad as you first thought, perhaps?