wat
wat
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
Originally Posted by tereg
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
awat
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
That.
Was.
AWESOME
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
It said that I needed one character !
So I gave it what it asked for !
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
Quotamid.
But I digress.
I DON'T WANNA DIE.
WHY DID I HAVE TO BE A TEREGSLAVE?
niffweed17 as ISFj > INTj is probably the dumbest thing I've seen posted in a while.
Do you not read myposts, then, DeAnte?
He's probably not ESI, obviously. But it's a lot more plausible than LII given his valued functions, unless you'd rather suggest LII for him on the ambiguous criteria that he's NT.
W/e to everything else, but when I called attention to the the various male Ni egos, I was pointing to both the Ni and Se manifestation in their speech and behavior.
We are at a disagreement here Jrxtes about something in particular, which I've argued (slightly) with you before. The difference is that I believe a person expresses all their valued elements behaviorally (in differing quantities and qualities).
I use to think it was more like this:
valued - strong
unvalued - weak
However I came up with something that makes more sense (to me, at least)
Ego - strong
Id - primitive
Super Id - primitive
Superego - weak
But yeah...uhhh...
oh.
I've been down the whole "Archon's Ni" deal before. No. I'm really not.
Actually I'm curious about why people think this... I'll make a thread.
The end is nigh
I haven't read half the posts in this thread.
As little interest as I have in niffweed17's type, Se-PoLR makes a million times more sense than Se ego or DS as well as INTj/IJ > ISFj/INTp, which is based on weird ass humor and videos alone.
edit: @ Archon, I don't care for the "strong/weak" language either.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote