Quote Originally Posted by CuriousSoul
IWhat I would object to is the attempt to define the type almost exclusively based on the first and second functions (the egoblock).
You're completely right. Most of the people do that very mistake typifying by finding signs of 1st, 2nd and 4th functions - the easy-to-find ones, making the whole thing absurd and mixing up even activators (4th and 7th are look-alikes. Imho you can "hit" the 7th so that it will be even more painfull. Besides superid - one wants to create using it so desperately! Especially the 6th - all one needs is a teacher. So 5th can be easily mixed up with 2nd.)