Me.
Nozick
Socrates
Plato
Jesus
Karl Popper Popper
Leibniz
Jeremy Bentham
Descartes
Spinoza
Locke
Berkeley
Hume
Kant
Nietzsche
Schopenhauer
Epicurus
Ayn Rand
Heidegger
Husserl
Russell
Wittgenstein
Ayer
Sartre
Rousseau
J. S. Mill
Me.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Foucault
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
I was in the bathroom yesterday yelling at the mirror "I TAKE IT YOU HAVEN'T READ YOUR BASIC KANT!"
No kidding.
I vote for Fonzie or Mr. C.
That makes me think of Virginia Woolf and something of hers I read (A Room of One's Own, I think?). She would be up there on my list for that alone.
But, damn, I really don't have a clue who Foucault is. Maybe I should look him up sometime.
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
I've never even heard of any of those. They're not mainstream philosophers, are they? They're even less well-known than philosophers such as Carnap, Putnam, Kuhn, Quine and Frege. They probably rank along side philosophers like Block, Fodor, Jackson and Kripke.
Heidegger's there. I considered Kierkegaard.
But this is about the greatest philosopher - not the greatest theorist. Otherwise the list would be epic.
I did consider him as well, but didn't think he was as prominent as some of the others.But my favourite is and most likely always will be Foucault. I think I even mentioned him my type thread, as though adoring him would somehow help me discover my type.
Fuck him. He's overrated.
Did you list Kierkegaard..? And Heidegger, with his overly thick sentences.
I'd pick Simone de Beauvoir... The ethics of ambiguity is probably my favorite book of this ilk.
(I wouldn't mind living like Jean-Jacques though... Except, you know, perhaps I'd be slightly better to my family... Perhaps and slightly.)
Try Julia Kristeva for a female post-structuralist philosopher.
Also, you're missing a lot of people there! What about Althusser, Lacan, Todorov, Barthes etc etc etc. Sure, with structuralism and post-structuralism, you're moving ever more away from strict 'philosophy' toward a blending with other 'schools' or 'disciplines', which is why I prefer using the broader category of theorists.
But my favourite is and most likely always will be Foucault. I think I even mentioned him my type thread, as though adoring him would somehow help me discover my type.
()
3w4-1w2-5w4 sx/sp
Wittgenstein was the most genial, especially in his paradoxical conclusion in regard to the study of philosophy.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
even richard nixon has got soul ... dadadadaderrrrr ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
wittgenstein won my vote
The question is in regards to the greatest philosopher and not necessarily about one's favorite philosopher (sorry Spinoza :frown, so I voted for Kant. Why Kant? The birth of modern philosophy was divided into two main camps: rationalists (Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz) and the empiricists (Locke, Berkeley, Hume). Kant argued against and reconciled both while also creating his own original ideas. While I am not a fan of the German idealism that followed Kant, he cannot be held responsible for the bad philosophers that followed. Modern philosophy (secular and religious) lives in his philosophical wake. There is no return to Pre-Kantian philosophy; he changed the nature of the philosophical framework.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi