More very obvious 1:1 comparisons between Socionics and Alchemy

[Angel von Himmel]

ILE, maybe, but EIE is hard for me to see; though I'm no expert on EIE's.

I remember Hugo showing me some chart he made and I experienced a similar kind of "my heads going to explode" reaction. He explained to me that I got that reaction because I have weak Ti. I need things to be clean, clear, crisp, and direct to the point if I'm going to put any effort into understanding something.

The only way to understand the charts is to read the resources I give out and see how they all relate to one another, and to know all the bits of relevant socionics, alchemy, and astrology required to understand how there exist comparisons.

Of course, unless one is already well studied that takes time and effort and apparently many of the people who are opposed to this system as it is built would rather make denials followed by weak refutations than to look at the resources involved to see if there is indeed a comparison.

[strrrng]

Absolutely irrefutable. I'm befuddled as to why others don't grasp this obvious correlation.

[Angel von Himmel]

Absolutely irrefutable. I'm befuddled as to why others don't grasp this obvious correlation.

It might be refutable ... just it seems that people who try to refute it have no clue what it is that they are actually refuting.

[strrrng]

It might be refutable ... just it seems that people who try to refute it have no clue what it is that they are actually refuting.

A lot of the people who promote it seem to have no clue what it is they're promoting, either.

[Angel von Himmel]

A lot of the people who promote it seem to have no clue what it is they're promoting, either.

True, it is in the development stages and not everything is total clockwork.

[strrrng]

True, it is in the development stages and not everything is total clockwork.

Except the planetary rotations governing intertype relations.

[Angel von Himmel]

Except the planetary rotations governing intertype relations.

Where ... ?