There is nothing positive about one's PoLR. If you have something positive to say about someone's PoLR, just attribute it to their creative function instead.
There is nothing positive about one's PoLR. If you have something positive to say about someone's PoLR, just attribute it to their creative function instead.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
hmm.Originally Posted by Crispy
the positive thing of polr is that you have an absence of something in your personality.
sure the absense of some great things, but also the absense of things that are consideren bad.
for example
polr Te, not too businesslike
polr Ni, not dreamy
polr Ne, no crazy ideas
Could all of those strengths not be attributed tocreative
creative and
creative respectively?
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
could not focusing on the relevant content of what is being said, but choosing to nit-pick in stead, be attributed to Ne creative? hi hi just joking using my feeble Ti cuz you hit my polr
Jarno, your response I felt totally protected my polr
n00bIEE
Possibly. If you were just saying those are good things about BEING an Fe-PoLR then that's fine. Just thought you were trying to claim what is supposedly the biggest weakness as a strength somehow.
The only reason I said anything is cause it's like me claiming "
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
To discuss Fe's relation to the use of Te, we would necessarily be discussing the use of Te, which has many strengths. It is its use that leads to the failure in Fe matters.Possibly
The only reason I said anything is cause it's like me claiming "
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Don't you wonder why? *Food for thought*could not focusing on the relevant content of what is being said, but choosing to nit-pick in stead, be attributed to Ne creative? hi hi just joking using my feeble Ti cuz you hit my polr
Jarno, your response I felt totally protected my polr
-
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It's the same thing!Could all of those strengths not be attributed to
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Yeah. It can be understood as a part of one's creative function, but it can also be understood as a direct consequence of one's PoLR.hmm.
the positive thing of polr is that you have an absence of something in your personality.
sure the absense of some great things, but also the absense of things that are consideren bad.
for example
polr Te, not too businesslike
polr Ni, not dreamy
polr Ne, no crazy ideas
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
