Quote Originally Posted by Heretic 007 View Post
ILE might not really appreciate the time aspects. They might throw lots of time to their projects that do not result in anything at all but is rather fun and interesting. <-- probably the best version of Ni ignoring.


As a result they might drag others into their own rabbit hole of impossibilities.

Some gone far examples: study for years something that is doomed not to result in payback.
Yes, but you know it's going to take years. You know you're going to spend a lot of time on something fun and interesting but that has a low probability of material payback. Both types can easily evaluate ROI and efficiency with 4D Te; LSE will take that evaluation as paramount while ILE may disregard it in favor of fun/interesting. But the point is that you know how long it's going to take. LSE has much less awareness about that due to the Ni PoLR compared to your Ni ignoring