Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 53 of 53

Thread: Struggling to find your type?

  1. #41
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    of course straight men think that the only way a woman can be happy is with them
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  2. #42
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    How dare you imply I'm mainstream.
    Heh. I'm sorry if you feel that way. And I think you should really drop that knife and use a flower instead. And I'm not only talking about your avatar
    What is that supposed to mean?
    It means I'm reading minor hostility in your comments But I might wrong Anyways flower power beats knife power in my books :wink: So, what type are you? People say INTj but people are often wrong.
    Oh, no doubt about minor hostility. But there is some lightheartedness in their, too. I can come off strong sometimes. Flower power..... hmm...... well I'd still like to see how our pillow fight would go... :wink:


    I believe I fit best into the INTj catagory. If you met me in real life, and knew about personality typing, you'd be able to recognize my "personality type".. But I'm not limited to it. I don't think I really can fit into a specific 'box'. That's not really the essence of contingency, anyways.

    the "U" (UDP) was for "undefined".
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  3. #43
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    of course straight men think that the only way a woman can be happy is with them
    To be honest with you, I know that a woman could be happy with another woman. I've seen it, numerous times.

    That's (one reason) why I would be very appreciative if I should ever actually settle down and have a real relationship with a woman. Or should I say 'if a woman were to ever settle down with me'...
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  4. #44
    Creepy-

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    Quote Originally Posted by ishysquishy
    Maybe the assumption that men are T and women are F is a hetereosexist construct meant to tell us that our "dual" (read "complimenting partner" to not restrict it to Socionics) can only be someone of the opposite sex.
    There is nothing complementary about two female genitalia. And discojoe already explained in a poetic way the complementary nature of strong male arms and delicate women bodies. This leads me to believe that also psychologically the only way to find truly complementary relationship is between people of opposite genders. Idea of same sex complementary relationships also conflict with the ISTp yin-yang philosophy of the universe. But then again I don't want to be the official fun spoiler so please have it your way

  5. #45
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    That's (one reason) why I would be very appreciative if I should ever actually settle down and have a real relationship with a woman. Or should I say 'if a woman were to ever settle down with me'...
    What's all this "if" bullshit?

    I quit smoking in April. I had tried to quit at least a hundred times. Then one day I understood the difference between trying to quit and quitting. Your inner monologue determines the course of your life.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  6. #46
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    edit, again
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  7. #47
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    That's (one reason) why I would be very appreciative if I should ever actually settle down and have a real relationship with a woman. Or should I say 'if a woman were to ever settle down with me'...
    What's all this "if" bullshit?

    I quit smoking in April. I had tried to quit at least a hundred times. Then one day I understood the difference between trying to quit and quitting. Your inner monologue determines the course of your life.
    contingency.

    Besides, I don't really know right now whether or not I really want to pursue a relationship, and if so, of what magnitude. There are many relative things.
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  8. #48
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Go read the INTj virginity thread.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  9. #49
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    Go read the INTj virginity thread.
    You go read it. I know enough about virginity and how INTjs can be as such. Maybe I'll check it out anyways.
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  10. #50
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    okay then
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  11. #51
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,747
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  12. #52
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    I believe I fit best into the INTj catagory. If you met me in real life, and knew about personality typing, you'd be able to recognize my "personality type".. But I'm not limited to it. I don't think I really can fit into a specific 'box'. That's not really the essence of contingency, anyways.
    I can see why INTjs and INFjs are called look-a-likes That could have been written by an INFj except maybe the "If you met me in real life, and knew about personality typing, you'd be able to recognize my "personality type"-part. INFj might not admit that much :wink:

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    the "U" (UDP) was for "undefined".
    Haha. I get it now

  13. #53
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ishysquishy
    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    Quote Originally Posted by ishysquishy
    Maybe the assumption that men are T and women are F is a hetereosexist construct meant to tell us that our "dual" (read "complimenting partner" to not restrict it to Socionics) can only be someone of the opposite sex.
    There is nothing complementary about two female genitalia. And discojoe already explained in a poetic way the complementary nature of strong male arms and delicate women bodies. This leads me to believe that also psychologically the only way to find truly complementary relationship is between people of opposite genders. Idea of same sex complementary relationships also conflict with the ISTp yin-yang philosophy of the universe. But then again I don't want to be the official fun spoiler so please have it your way
    :wink:

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •