Last edited by Expat; 09-29-2008 at 04:22 PM. Reason: typo
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
I'm also INFp (though I don't think I am, which means I am).
you're only INFp if you disagree with Te types.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
INFp is a trash bin type in the same way that E6 is. Almost anyone can be INFp. Anyone can be E6.
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
If I DID think I was INFp at first, this means that I'm actually not? Does it work both ways?
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
Allie is not IEI! She absolutely does not have Ni as her first function! It seriously bothers me that people refuse to see this!
EII 4w5
so/sx (?)
I have observed her and interacted with her in several different types of situations, not just her posts here, but also on aim and extensively on stickam. Others who know her quite well agree that she does not use Ni as her primary function. If someone who believes that she is iei could please lead me to some information about how she has written posts here indicates Ni base function then I would consider this possibility. ("getting along with ashton" does not count as valid information for typing. I am saying kind-of as a joke, but also because this has been an argument from several people, and I think it is silly.)
EII 4w5
so/sx (?)
I have no precise idea of her type, and I voiced my tentative opinion only at her request.
I just think that "show me how her posts indicate Ni as a base function" is the same circular reasoning that is going on here:
- I know that someone writes as someone with Ni as base function because they write like those I know have Ni as base function.
It's like "he is Ni-dominant because he writes like the Ni dominants I know" and "if he does not write like the Ni dominants I know, then he is not a Ni dominant".
Which is circular thinking at its best.
Last edited by Expat; 09-30-2008 at 05:34 PM.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
http://forums.socionics.ws/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=66
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ead.php?t=2008
i hesitate a bit about harping on these threads especially as evidence, but i think that this case is extremely well documented in these threads which clearly you have no familiarity with.
yes, it does."getting along with ashton" does not count as valid information for typing.
i want to blow off both of your heads and eat your brains.
i want to rub your blood on my chest and arms, and take a shower
Well, someone is kinky.
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows