I'm yet to see the original, and I probably won't for some time, since I saw this quite recently.
Ann: LSE
George: EII
Paul: EIE
Peter: IEI
The kid isn't worth typing. You don't really know what he is.
Funny Games (film)
I'm yet to see the original, and I probably won't for some time, since I saw this quite recently.
Ann: LSE
George: EII
Paul: EIE
Peter: IEI
The kid isn't worth typing. You don't really know what he is.
Terrible film. It even failed at being disturbing.
Naomi Watts getting tied up in her underwear was pretty much the main highlight.
el oh elOriginally Posted by discojoe
Was this the movie about the dad who builds houses and the druggy, emo son?
4w3-5w6-8w7
No, it's about a vacationing family of three and their dog who are terrorized/tortured/etc by two psychopathic early 20s yuppie dudes. It's supposed to be disturbing and tense, but I found it dull and silly.
why the fuck do paul and peter look so alike. and someone is missing, according to peter's description. this is fucking annoying
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
Paul and Peter are easy to tell apart in the movie.
i watched this movie last night and i loved it. what a creatively fucked up concept for a film.
i don't know what ann and george's types are but i thought paul was a clear-cut ILE. peter was fairly one-dimensional imo but given his chemistry with paul i could see xEI.
paul was absolutely wonderful though. i can't remember the last time i was this attracted to a fictional character.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote