discussion of the century. more importantly, why?
discussion of the century. more importantly, why?
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
the singing guy was ISTp imo
4w3-5w6-8w7
I have a feeling in 4 days this thread's gonna have 100+ replies and you still won't have a type pinned on ya.
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire
I like you, therefore I believe you are in my quadra.
Or UDP in disguise.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Right now you look like a panda. a particularly nimble one, actually.
EII; E6(w5)
i am flakey
Liking someone only means so much.
As for implied, I had a small realization talking with her a few weeks ago in regard to her type. I think she is INTp. She seems to not value Fe much, and to talk in an intuitive way, especially Ni and what to me is "Ni dominant talk" (which I probably can't substantiate in words right now). I see similarities between her and niffweed, and she strikes me as ILI>ESI. I don't see much in the way of having dominance. I don't see anything delta really, only ISTp. But the strongest thing I get from her is Ni talk, which I've found very frustrating. I later realized that it wasn't intentional on her part, but I suspect it lead to some "unsmooth" communications between us in the past.
I don't talk to implied much nor do I know her in person, so I don't think I have enough evidence to say anything conclusively. But that's what it seems like, at this time.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Her first is in broomstick, and her second is in mushroom. Cackle!
ENFp or INTp
EII 4w5
so/sx (?)
You remind me of Mea, whom I have met irl.
Implied is not the same type as dee.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
yeah, i hate to say this, but that's one that should be rather obvious.
i'm fairly certain that i view the world and process information in a very similar to niffweed and reyn. perhaps salawa would be a contender, but i don't know her well enough to say, really. ISFp is sort of an indefensible suggestion. i think polr makes more sense in general and my issues with what i see as "truly aggressive people" are one thing that makes me doubt that i value Se. but then i look at people like danielle/liveandletlive and she's so easy to get along with. so perhaps we could be good activity partners or superegos, kamangir.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
No, but let's not make this about me.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Oh, oh, right.
Yeah, implied is INTp imo
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
Implied is Delta. She is Te ego and she likes to eat panda meat, Si+Ne FTW.
Clear identical behavior.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
IMO there is a quick way to know oneself's type: if your best friends are delta, then you are an delta... if your best friends are dynamics, then you are an static...if everybody believes that you are weird but ISFp's tell you that in a funny way then you are an ENTp...
If you take drugs you are an ISTp... if you bother a mad dog he will probably bite your leg..f you eat too much you will become a fat person...if you talk to strangers you will be raped..if you don't pay your taxes you won't go to heaven...if you are detected you fail and if you fail you die and your failure means my failure and I will not fail...if you can face the setting sun and say"tomorrow will be another day" ....
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
i completely disagree with both of you. i think Se DS is a rather obvious facet of her character -- demonstrated by her inactivity and need for stimulation -- and i have no idea why anyone would see the opposite.
Does anyone have a link to a post where Implied has used a lot of Te?
really, i even question my own confidence in Si. it's why i've even picked INTj as an option in the poll. it's an arena where i waver a bit in confidence.
i don't feel like i have tons of problems holding my own in an argument or stating unpopular things, which i guess could be interpreted as creative Se, although i really don't know that it is.
that isn't a bad observation. i'm not sure that the only manifestation of status snobbery = Se-HA, but it's one that is rather annoying to me, really extremely so.i think she is some sort of Te-ITp. although ISFj was considered, what she's said about activity levels preferred in other people would seem to rule out a peak-Te EJ for her dual. and discussions on status indicate an aversion to peak-Se HA types.
Fi?you could put her on the other side of peak-INTp, but why would a peak-Se DS find possible INFj's (we've recently VI'd) appealing?
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Although it was a pretty isolated incident, when my SEE friend was on cam with me that one night, maria did seem pretty stimulated by the attention. Even though he wasn't being extremely clever or anything, I don't think I've seen her smile that much before or since. Maybe I'm reading too much into that, but I remember thinking it was very noticeable at the time.
ETA: I should note that I don't think that's conclusive of ILI per se, but I think an SLI might get annoyed by the way he's so in-your-face, regardless of his good intentions.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
eh, don't think i haven't also noticed this. brian wilson & aishwarya rai (lol) both -- off the top of my head. some others as well.
they're one step away from being dual to SLE. though it may be too restrictive an inference on my part, since there is more to attraction than type of course.
who is one step away from being dual to SLE? INTp or INFj? and yeah, it could be too strict of an inference (even the "wow, ESFjs are interesting!" bit on my part.) that's what i'm trying to keep away from and what has kept me with a small degree of uncertainty about my own type.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
my secretly held opinion (well, secret until now) has been that Implied might be INTj... Has Niffweed considered INTj as well...? (Same type as Carla, regardless.)
Usually I'm good at picking up Fi-valuing, e.g. Joy, Expat... I haven't sensed it w/ Implied, but honestly, perhaps that's due to lack of exposure... Haven't noticed Te or Si either, to be honest...
I'm not trying to start anything--just stating what I've noticed.
lol well, good observations then. (; i don't personally see myself as very similar to carla at all. but then she doesn't really give a lot of information about herself to say what her type is either way. i don't feel as though many ENFps have been problematic for me except you. anyhow, if your definition of "using a lot of Te" means "YOU ARE LII YOU STUPID FUCKING AUTISTIC DIPSHIT" then no, you won't find me using it.
Last edited by implied; 08-25-2008 at 05:52 AM.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
My interpretation of it was that you thought the Harvard comment was elitist, and thus you disliked it on principle; also, you defended ya boyyyyy Niffweed when he got caught up in it... It prob didn't help that Sean posted some things under my name when he was here haha.
So if I'm reading the situation correctly, I can see the Fi in there, and also the democratic values... Like I said though, I don't know you well enough to know whether I am.
As to ISTp... Are you good with that kinda stuff? Si, I mean..? My best friend is INTp, and he's not very good with it at all.... (A quick glance around your room/working area should tell a lot re: Si haha)
LOL @ YOU ARE LII
right, so, if you want to look at it through a reinin lens (which i honestly don't at the moment) you could say that's a very democratic stance to take.
yeah, it really depends on if other things are out of order. like my desk is quite honestly a mess, but then it isn't stopping me from working at the moment. if it begins to be a problem, i'll do something eventually. but i can easily go with a messy/cluttered desk if it isn't stopping me from working.As to ISTp... Are you good with that kinda stuff? Si, I mean..? My best friend is INTp, and he's not very good with it at all.... (A quick glance around your room/working area should tell a lot re: Si haha)
heh, well, i saw smccosker pulling this a few times, but this thread is about me at any rate.LOL @ YOU ARE LII
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Implied, do you identify more with caregiver or victim behavior..?
I'll freely admit, the most obvious thing about me re: Socionics is probably 'infantile' lol
who the fuck are you saying i got caught up in that? i ignored the comment like the fucking stupid attempt at cutting short the argument that it was. i never said anything about it at all other than in talking about your type. other people were the people that called you out on that kind of bullshit. i didn't say shit about it.
fuck you, idiot. i take great offense at this. get your facts straight before you go barging and blindly attacking me for things that didn't happen.