Winterpark

[Ezra]

Recently I've noticed this change from an unassuming, chilled, amiable guy to this SLE-type character that reminds me of myself. On top of this, at least one individual has explained at some point to me during my time here that SLI is unlikely for Winterpark. I'm bringing his type under discussion.

I'm bringing your type under discussion, Winterpark.

[FDG]

I have noticed absolutely zero change in winterpark.

[Sirena]

Unassuming, chilled, and amiable are not words that I would use to describe winterpark. Having said that, I don't really have an opinion on his type.

[aestrivex]

i'm increasingly of the impression that none of winterpark, jessica, or lokivanguard are SLI (all of them basically are looking more and more like beta STs to me), and that people around here have no concept of what an SLI is.

[duality is cringe]

SLIs don't exist.

I like Winterpark.

[FDG]

i'm increasingly of the impression that none of winterpark, jessica, or lokivanguard are SLI (all of them basically are looking more and more like beta STs to me), and that people around here have no concept of what an SLI is.

The fact that in your room there aren't people except you, doesn't mean people don't actually exist.

[Ezra]

wtf is your point? i'm not sure i even get what you're trying to get at with this.

He's claiming that niffweed needs to get out more and experience life to understand what human beings are truly like.

[FDG]

wtf is your point? i'm not sure i even get what you're trying to get at with this.

It's absolutely idiotic to suggest that noone of the people self-typing as SLIs aren't SLIs because of some strange reason. They know themselves better than niffweed knows them, and suggesting that "nobody has a clue about X" is completely counterproductive for any discussion on the matter.

[snegledmaca]

i'm increasingly of the impression that none of winterpark, jessica, or lokivanguard are SLI (all of them basically are looking more and more like beta STs to me), and that people around here have no concept of what an SLI is.

I share your sentiments. And would like to extend it to IEE-s as well.

[Ezra]

See, niff, the problem I have with that sentiment is that a lot of those have been described as LSIs, which I completely disagree with. For example, Nicole, who is clearly not IJ. She gives off the impression of an IP far better than she does an IJ. Not only this, but the fundamentals of the LSI and the fundamentals of Nicole are pretty much not compatible. With Luis, I can see the case for Beta, but I still don't think he has a focus on Se like, for example, I do. Perhaps you could say his Se looks more like it does in Herzy.

[aestrivex]

See, niff, the problem I have with that sentiment is that a lot of those have been described as LSIs, which I completely disagree with. For example, Nicole, who is clearly not IJ. She gives off the impression of an IP far better than she does an IJ. Not only this, but the fundamentals of the LSI and the fundamentals of Nicole are pretty much not compatible. With Luis, I can see the case for Beta, but I still don't think he has a focus on Se like, for example, I do. Perhaps you could say his Se looks more like it does in Herzy.

i'd probably call both jessica and winterpark SLEs rather than LSIs at this point. lv probably the same, actually.

[Ms. Kensington]

I have noticed absolutely zero change in winterpark.

hahahah

[Park]

I'm bringing your type under discussion, Winterpark.

Cool man, I don't mind. This sentence you directed at me (the one I am quoting) was not a necessity though, you're just repeating yourself. And thanks, I guess.

I have noticed absolutely zero change in winterpark.

Thanks man, I can say the same about you.

i'd probably call both jessica and winterpark SLEs rather than LSIs at this point. lv probably the same, actually.

I am sure we all appreciate that very much. What you call us is of an extremely high importance to us and our self-growth.

[aestrivex]

What you call us is of an extremely high importance to us and our self-growth.

it was never intended to be.

[Park]

it was never intended to be.

well you've outdone yourself this time I guess. you 've reached a higher target than you could 've ever expected.

[jason_m]

Years later, but I have noticed something: there are a lot of people who are 'SLI' who seem like Beta STs. The assumption is that they are 'lying' about their type, but I have noticed so many of them that my guess is that they simply do not identify with or like 'Fe.' There is also this underlying assumption that they secretly value Fe and therefore EIEs, but could this (and therefore Model A on this point) simply be wrong?

I have also been toying with certain notions in Model A:

For instance, like those SLIs, ILIs can be blatantly honest and outspoken as well. Maybe ILIs function-stack is really:
1. Ti.
2. Ne.
3. Si.
4. Fe

and SLIs:
1. Ti.
2. Se.
3. Ni.
4. Fe.

And they are therefore similar...

Also about those who actually type themselves as LSIs:

Haven't you noticed that many of them identify with structure, attention-to-detail, precise analysis, etc.? Now, what about the 'INTj's who are that way? To me, those 'INTjs' sound more like LIEs or LSEs... (Think of someone like Kurt Godel).

Maybe then those 'LSIs' are something like ESTjs - with a different function ordering - and the 'LIIs' who are that way are something like ENTjs... Both really into the objective factor and therefore both Te-leading...

In any event, I think parts of the theory have to be redone...