Who's your enneagram dual?
Which enneagram type would you consider to be your "dual"?
My "enneagram dual" is type 7.
I 'd also pick type 4 as my 2nd ideal partner (maybe less like a "dual" in socionics terms, although I could see that too, but more as a 2nd best long-term potential relationship)
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Counterphobic 6's AW YEEEEEAH!
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
Why in particular do you like counter phobic 6's? (or do you jest here?)
I'm so serious you don't even know!~
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
probably 7 or 8
Are you asking me to gay marry you? because the answer is YES. That might've been too much.... I couldn't stop clicking things for added effect.
Anyway, maybe 2 or 9? I'm not sure. I'm not that well versed in enneagram and I haven't really tried matching people I know with enneagram types at all, although for some of them it shouldn't be too hard.
I would think my enneagram dual is 3. Second choice is 4.
Even if threes can get on my nerves sometimes I think three would be more beneficial to me because they would motivate me to achieve. To fulfill my potential. They wouldn't let me slow down. Four would be someone I could spend good time with but who would passivate me. Four is like a "lazy man's choice" for me. Three would make me work harder for the relationship than a four would.
Seven would likely be the least compatible. Or perhaps I just misunderstand the types because in theory seven shouldn't be such a bad match. Just from what I read about it I don't get good vibes. They seem somehow chaotic, random and unpredictable. The opposite of what I need.
9s, most definitely. 9w1 over 9w8 probably I think
I can also imagine 1 as a type I can be compatible with, but we both have to be very healthy
least compatible: 3, then 8
Last edited by FDG; 08-08-2008 at 12:01 PM.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
(There is no such thing as an enneagram dual. As such I also disagree with Phaudrus' incessant drive for correlations and so on)
Nevertheless,
Sort of similar to that.
9w1s much more than 9w8.
1s, although they need to be ethical rather than logical
2s, somewhat
3s, probably not.
least compatible: Absolutely no chance with 8 or 5. Probably not 4s or 7s.
My " " " dual range " " " would be between 9w1 and 2w3.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I'm fairly certain that if I just pretend like I'm being praised for long enough eventually you guys will start to believe it
Damn, burntorange is like a stud, guys. Bow down and worship this greek god! Sacrifice a lamb or a cow or something, bitches!I'm fairly certain that if I just pretend like I'm being praised for long enough eventually you guys will start to believe it
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
All I wanted was your hand in gay marriage, not to be your god. wtf? Some roast lamb does sound delicious, though...
After reading through it all, I think I'd get along with sevens the most, and maybe sixes as well. Not sure I could with eights.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
E6, E1, sx primary.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Probably 8s and 1s (but I'm biased about the 1 lol)
I tend to like 7s but they are too... 7ish.
And yes, I also don't get along with sx last types, not in an intimate relationship that is.
I believe 8s and to some extent also 1s. My best ISFj friend is 1, my ESTj partner is 8.
I just read this thread lol... Phaedrus was a cunt.
I find I have more attraction to 7s, but am ultimately not satisfied because they aren't as stable as an 8 (or 1). I haven't ever been in a relationship with an 8, but I've dated two 7s (Se-SEE 7w6 and Se-SLE 7w8). I think it is different because I'm probably a 2 rather than a 4. From my perspective, i just wanted to help both of them, the SEE to a lesser extent, and they both rejected my help, SLE being more rejecting than the SEE.
The SEE didn't need it nearly as much, but whenever something unpleasant came up, he would try to change the subject back to lighthearted conversation (even about things that REALLY mattered).
The SLE, otoh, was a bit different. He was very conflicted and emotionally fucked up, and basically rejected all of my efforts to help him (and he very obviously needed help from someone). A lot of tragic things happened to him, biggest one was his mom being murdered on his birthday. I can remember one particular incident when we were in his car, in a parking lot, and he just started crying. I tried talking to him a couple of times and he didn't respond, so I just held his hand. It went on for about 20-30 minutes when he suddenly stopped and then started making silly jokes. Things like this happened often, like once a week. He would get really upset and then afterwards act like nothing had happened.
I guess maybe the ones I have dated aren't good examples because they both had some inner turmoil, but that is basically why I say 8>7. I like 7s as friends though.
PHAEDRUS PHAEDRUS PHAEDRUS PHAEDRUS PHAEDRUS PHAEDRUS
Where's DJ to have tourettes with when you need him
DJ is like the funnest person to have tourettes with ever. Without him it's only mildly individually entertaining, as entertaining as laughing to yourself in public when no one else is laughing.
Bump
7w8, 8, 5, 2
And Phaedrus seems like such a wonderful person
The only people who come to mind as 9w8/8w9 sx/sp are ToshIro Mifune and Ian Anderson respectively. Maybe Bryan Adams too? He might be sp/sx though.
Who in the world types me as 9?
Yea, who does that? Show yourself. This is madness.
Your Enneagram Type and Dating
What's your type (number and wing, if you know it)? Which types have you dated?
Which relationships were the best and worst for you (and why, if you'd like to share)?
6w5 sx/sp here, was into a 5w6 sp/sx for a couple years. I would imagine that any sx/sp type would be best for me, although I'd probably prefer 9w8, 8w9, and maybe 5w6 over others.
Ever thought of both types of 4?
I haven't had much interaction with 4s, but I imagine that both of our emotional preferences wouldn't balance very well; I need someone to ground me in reality and bring me back to earth when I get overreactive and anxious.
Any thoughts on this as well:
http://www.similarminds.com/idealtypes.html
Thanks for the responses.
I've mostly dated 6s and 9s. I fare much better with 9s.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Im guessing 9w8 would be more preferable.
E type and Socionics Match
I make the best match with LSE 8w7or 1w2
I've never met an LSE 3.
I've never met an LSE 1w9 in person.
I love LSE 6w5 or 6w7 like they are my children.
I've never met any other LSE except 8w7 or 1w2 who are attracted to me like honey YUM.
I HATE LSE 7. They are like blank objects that don't feel the emptiness or the pain of others if they do they are sure good about excusing it. I hate other things about LSE 7 like how they are not as affectionate as LSE 8 and I think to some extent I also find them annoying. I think the least person that can actually connect with a dual is a 7. They are particularly more manipulative due to their extraversion factor.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-01-2013 at 04:24 PM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Or, I should say I make the best match with an LSE who is the most self reflective...that would be E1 wouldn't it?
By self reflective I mean someone like my cousin who consideres that they could have hurt me in doing or saying something and then jump or respond to make sure that there were no hard feelings created in the process. Or maybe she's just a healthy and secure LSE like Bryan. Bryan's pretty healthy and well adjusted as far as LSE go.
Oksana is LSE 1w2
Bryan is LSE 8w7
OMG I'm in LSE heaven
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-01-2013 at 03:28 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I know an LSE 8w7.
sureCan I be LSE 7?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
aw I didn't mean it
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Try SLE. And start hating E3 as well.
I've noticed that lot of 6s are a bit too clingy to work well with a 7 (at least a 7 who is an ethical type - the logical types who are 7s might find it more tolerable and some might even like it)
They're going to do fine. Cerebral palsy is sought by E6 in E7.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
