Results 1 to 40 of 133

Thread: John Stossel explains why socialized health care is retarded

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,684
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    That's exactly how things are now.
    Ummm...the United States government does not provide any public healthcare as far as I know.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    blah
    Last edited by Rocky; 11-28-2009 at 04:37 PM.
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  3. #3

    Default

    Belgium, the uk, and south korea spend half of what the us does per capita and they cover their ENTIRE populations. The us uses its health care system as just another method to harvest its population's dwindling resources.
    Stolen Identity by Argentina

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQjC-q5FBgk

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,516
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HollywoodWanderer View Post
    Belgium, the uk, and south korea spend half of what the us does per capita and they cover their ENTIRE populations. The us uses its health care system as just another method to harvest its population's dwindling resources.
    The actual care is more expensive because it's not shitty. Why do you think so many people come to the US for cancer treatment? To save money? No. It's because they don't want to die.

  5. #5
    force my hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,332
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    The actual care is more expensive because it's not shitty. Why do you think so many people come to the US for cancer treatment? To save money? No. It's because they don't want to die.
    Why do Americans go to other countries for healthcare, then, if it's so top quality?

    ...ohhhh, right....

    There's a trade-off, my friend, and ignoring it on ideology alone isn't going to prove much.
    SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    173
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    The actual care is more expensive because it's not shitty. Why do you think so many people come to the US for cancer treatment? To save money? No. It's because they don't want to die.
    Stop filling this forum with your right-wingishness!
    LII

  7. #7
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by akeaneau View Post
    Stop filling this forum with your right-wingishness!
    I may not agree with discojoe's views, but at least he is putting up a hard argument. Where are your counterarguments?
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  8. #8
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bassano del Grappa, Via Rodolfi 35
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,835
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This discussions is pathetically ideological.
    Remember that economics should be aimed at bettering welfare, which has a clear psychological component. Which, in turn, means that competition is to be considered better as long as the utility function of the members of the society says so. So, saying that competition always leads to a better outcome may be true in strictly practical terms (but not always, given that in certain occasions cooperation is definitely much more efficient), but we should also consider the global effect of this kind of view.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •