If two men want to get married, then I think I should be able to marry my cat. It's all about love right?
If two men want to get married, then I think I should be able to marry my cat. It's all about love right?
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Honestly I'm not gonna lose sleep over two guys having sex. I honestly don't understand why people give such a shit.
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire
Really. I mean, call it human rights or whatever you want. Less time wasted in bullshit discussions, more time gained for doing anything else, be it more productive or more pleasurable, or be it gay sex.
One more gay men = one less straight men competing for women on the planet!
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I thought that the problem was that religious bias was interfering in legal affairs by making the gender of the persons who are trying to marry relevant when it actually isn't. It acknowledges opposite sex marriage, but not same sex marriage (because of an over-arching religious bias that it's immoral). If we could fortify the crumbling wall between church and state, I don't think this would even be a problem... because there would be no legal difference.
Not all heterosexual married couples have children. Some gay couples do. So I don't see why children would be a big part of it. And then there are single parents with children...
ETA: all that aside, discrimination against homosexuality is one of the major discriminatory issues in society... it comes out legally and in all facets of life. But it's not alone... we still have racial discrimination... and I'm not going to list every freaking discrimination. It's a battle against our own brains as near as I can tell.
ETA2: maybe it's not a "crumbling wall" - I'm not sure the wall has ever been all that fortified.
Last edited by marooned; 07-10-2008 at 11:22 PM.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Diana, why exactly are you against gay marriage? And, if you aren't, why are you against people expressing their desires to be given equal rights?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Never said that, but it you plan on legalizing a perversion, other perversions should be legalized also.This is of course assuming that heterosexuality is the dominant orientation and all other orientations are deviations.
I look at ancient greek culture for example. Homosexuality was condoned so soldiers would fight for each other with more vigor. Were they all homosexual by birth? Almost like greek pederasty and middle eastern/African bestiality tendencies. Simple perversion.
Now this doesn't change "equal rights", but that's how I think of it.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Whose definition of "perversion" are you using..?
Your argument is what's known as "moral subjectivism." In other words, you're arguing this: most ppl in this particular time, at this particular place are not gay, therefore we should not condone gayness, (currently the "non-dominant orientation.").
"Dominant orientation" does not always equal "correct." Case in point: Nazism was the "dominant [political] orientation" in Germany during the mid-1930s through the mid-1940s. If you had lived in Germany during that time, by your line of reasoning: all of the other political "deviations" would have been wrong and "perverted" (b/c they were "non-dominant orientations.")
By your line of reasoning, as you stated, Classical Greek and Roman cultures were "perverted" b/c homosexuality was considered culturally normal... Do you realize that they might have considered you--a strictly heterosexual person with biases about homosexuality--somewhat "perverse," the same way you currently consider gays "perverse?"
Who is to say they were wrong? And who is to say that you are right?
Last edited by JuJu; 07-11-2008 at 01:18 AM. Reason: wrong wording
JuJu, for what it's worth man, I'm all for it. I thought it was exceedingly fucked up when your friend told you to "lose his number". Like honestly... what's the damn problem?!?
I really don't see it as any form of perversion, I really don't see who they're hurting...
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire
Yeah.........
I wrote a +1000 word post, but I figure I'll wait a bit more.
My current stance on gay rights or anything else is what I said to B&D when we talked before: I compare it to how I feel about women.That's about it basically. I just can't imagine someone telling me that how I feel about women is wrong. So in that way, if I was naturally attracted to men and it's not something I can control, I can't imagine what it's like to be told that who you inherently are is wrong.
- I don't want to marry a woman because it's what God said. I really don't. It actually has nothing to do with any religion. It is because that is the kind of relationship I like.
- I am not attracted to women because I read the bible and it said that it was right to be attracted to a woman. I think they are hot, beautiful, amazing, adorable, and lovely. My urge to be with them is completely beyond my control. I want to have sex with one and be with one and take care of one and live with one. And if I felt that way about men for some reason, I'd sure as hell not want anyone telling me that's wrong. I don't think it's anyone's business what I find attractive or what I like, or who I like. I've gotten grief because I said a girl from another culture was attractive once, and that pissed me off. My likings are my likings and no one has any say but me. And if God has beef with them, I'll talk to him about it - fuck anyone else.
Alternately, what if someone came up and started telling me that I was wrong because I like women, and I should start being with men. I'd say fuck you to that, as well. I don't want anyone telling me what is right or wrong about my own personal preferences.
Especially in a situation like this, where being gay isn't really directly affecting anyone else - what does it matter? You going to to bitch someone out because they like white wine instead of red wine? Get real.
As for gay marriage being an issue, I don't really care. If gay people desire to get married, then so be it. Why should I have any say in it at all? Because of my personal beliefs?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I have no bias. I look at the facts before I make a judgment. Don't bring up a decade in history JuJu. Look at the average climate of sexual orientation. It has been heterosexual. Not to mention that anal sex is exceedingly dirty. I look at how AIDS has spread rampantly in Africa. Men contracting AIDS from god-knows-where, and then giving their wives and children the disease.
They're only human, who will make excuses for their behavior no matter what is thrown at them.Do you realize that they might have considered you--a strictly heterosexual person with biases about homosexuality--somewhat "perverse," the same way you currently consider gays "perverse?"
I actually have in real life. More like a couple. They're nice, but I don't condone their behavior.Kam have you ever talked with a gay person?
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
A man is capable of knowing he loves a woman and he is just as capable of deciding he loves a man. What behavior do you not approve of? The affection between two people capable of loving each other?
And also, why do you think your personal opinion on it even matters? It's not your right to decide that someone else's rights should be limited.
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
Very moral post coming.
Two men or two women can love each other, yes. Love is good. The bible even claims God is love, so why can't people love anyone, pansexually?
My problem is not with the love, it is with the result of the love, which in my opinion is harmful to family bonds. I don't believe two men can take the role of a motherly figure, nor can two women take the place of a father figure, no matter how hard they try.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Last edited by UDP; 07-11-2008 at 12:46 AM. Reason: Telling someont "so stop talking" usually isn't a good idea. I wouldn't like that done to me.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
lol.Not to mention that anal sex is exceedingly dirty
All sex is dirty.
Dear Kamangir,
I have to make sure that your exceedingly limited base of knowledge includes the following two things before I continue:
-Birds
-The problem of potential overpopulation of the human race
Love,
Gilly
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.