View Poll Results: From this sample, how does it read:

Voters
113. You may not vote on this poll
  • No Comment.

    0 0%
  • Aushra Augustinavichiute Would Be Proud!

    0 0%
  • It Was Total Crap!!

    0 0%
  • Great!!!

    0 0%
  • Not Good Enough, Try Again!

    0 0%
  • It's Okay.

    0 0%
  • It Made No Sense Whatsoever!

    0 0%
  • It Changed My Life!

    0 0%
  • 113 100.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: SOCIONICS: AN INTRODUCTION

  1. #41
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Then I think you're still missing the point.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  2. #42

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    258
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    your point is that intertype relations is what sets socionics apart from the mbti, i understand that
    Remember to keep things simple and not any simpler like Einstein once said.

  3. #43
    Creepy-Unlogged Expat

    Default

    No, my point is that intertype relationships is the very core of socionics.

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    258
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    fair point

    in my defence i will say this...

    i have written the profiles in such a way that you couldn't really read them on their own because i have subtly made hints that say, an INTj is comparative to an ISTj thus subconsciously setting it up for a new chapter or book later specifically on "what exactly is a comparative relationship?".

    i think i could re-work the intro to explain more on intertype relationships but in such a way that suggests that it is only an introduction and not a complete reference.

    the questions is... for a fuller description of the intertype relations, do i write a full intro to it plus a 5th chapter or another book entirely.

    ps. please don't think i'm being greedy or something by possibly splitting it into 2 works.
    Remember to keep things simple and not any simpler like Einstein once said.

  5. #45
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,763
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aurora_faerie
    You shouldn't give up just because some forum members said you suck...

    Why don't you just go through it again and try to see what they are talking about and fix it? Do some more research etc etc...
    Exactly. I agree.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •