Race & Impact on Personality Types

[tcaudilllg]

Now it is a proven fact -- you really are one of Hegel's disciples. Such incredible mumbo-jumbo, such disgusting misuse of languge ... "the use of subjective truth in the face of uncertainty ... such total intellectual crap ...

Where is Schopenhauer when you need him?

Dead, obviously.

Your problem is that you can't see the truth in other people's views. You can't accept that whatever their views, they each have a unique psychological perspective that leads to distinct form of truth.

The only way to judge such truth is its applicability on a large scale? Will it or will it not lead to effective adaptation to objective conditions? Will it or will it not support the growth of life?

Your truth cannot, and I see... no, I will not say it. It is true that I have basis for what I see... but it not socially acceptable. I will only predict... that 40 years hence, you will face your lie, and see it for the objective dishonesty it truly is.

[Phaedrus]

Your problem is that you can't see the truth in other people's views. You can't accept that whatever their views, they each have a unique psychological perspective that leads to distinct form of truth.

With almost every comment you make you are proving one of my general type theses: that LIIs tend to be self-refuting relativists. You are one of the most obvious examples of such an intellectual meltdown. Every form of relativism is necessarily either false (because it is self-refuting) or trivial. It is sad to see that you are an advocate of the former kind of relativism, which means that you are simply stupid. To attribute logical reasoning to is an insult to logic itself. I can't believe that people are so unable to see the obvious differences between your idiotic perspective and my perspective.

Your stance here is a typcial example of Reinin's Subjectivism. My stance is a typical example of Reinin's Objectivism. Every single member of this forum must be able to recognize this simple and extremely obvious fact.

The only way to judge such truth is its applicability on a large scale? Will it or will it not lead to effective adaptation to objective conditions? Will it or will it not support the growth of life?

This is a disgusting form of Subjectivism. Relativism is a plague. We should to our best to get rid of it. You don't understand the concept of truth, and you don't realize that your position is logically contradictory. How much worse can it get?

[Logos]

With almost every comment you make you are proving one of my general type theses: that LIIs tend to be self-refuting relativists. You are one of the most obvious examples of such an intellectual meltdown. Every form of relativism is necessarily either false (because it is self-refuting) or trivial. It is sad to see that you are an advocate of the former kind of relativism, which means that you are simply stupid. To attribute logical reasoning to is an insult to logic itself. I can't believe that people are so unable to see the obvious differences between your idiotic perspective and my perspective.

Your stance here is a typcial example of Reinin's Subjectivism. My stance is a typical example of Reinin's Objectivism. Every single member of this forum must be able to recognize this simple and extremely obvious fact.

This is a disgusting form of Subjectivism. Relativism is a plague. We should to our best to get rid of it. You don't understand the concept of truth, and you don't realize that your position is logically contradictory. How much worse can it get?

Fact or value judgment?

[Phaedrus]

Fact or value judgment?

Fact. And you know it if you have studied the Reinin dichotomies, which can and should be understood by every type.

[Logos]

Fact. And you know it if you have studied the Reinin dichotomies, which can and should be understood by every type.

You are trying to turn your own unempirical value judgment into a fact.

[Phaedrus]

You are trying to turn your own unempirical value judgment into a fact.

No. I am trying to make a value judgment based on the fact that LIIs are Subjectivists and ILIs are Objectvists. I don't respect our differences. I can't stand relativism in any form, and Subjectivism is a form of relativism, so I am kind of allergic to Subjectivism itself and the kind of world view that is typical of LIIs. Even though LIIs can't help that they are Subjectivists, it is objectively wrong to think like an LII. The thinking of an LII like tcaudilllg is logically incoherent, and we should never accept logical contradictions in our explanations or views on reality.

[Logos]

No. I am trying to make a value judgment based on the fact that LIIs are Subjectivists and ILIs are Objectvists. I don't respect our differences. I can't stand relativism in any form, and Subjectivism is a form of relativism, so I am kind of allergic to Subjectivism itself and the kind of world view that is typical of LIIs. Even though LIIs can't help that they are Subjectivists, it is objectively wrong to think like an LII. The thinking of an LII like tcaudilllg is logically incoherent, and we should never accept logical contradictions in our explanations or views on reality.

You have warped views of Socionics.

[Slacker]

No. I am trying to make a value judgment based on the fact that LIIs are Subjectivists and ILIs are Objectvists. I don't respect our differences. I can't stand relativism in any form, and Subjectivism is a form of relativism, so I am kind of allergic to Subjectivism itself and the kind of world view that is typical of LIIs. Even though LIIs can't help that they are Subjectivists, it is objectively wrong to think like an LII. The thinking of an LII like tcaudilllg is logically incoherent, and we should never accept logical contradictions in our explanations or views on reality.

And he thinks he's the dual of an ESFp. ROFL