Results 1 to 40 of 80

Thread: Race & Impact on Personality Types

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    EIE or ESI 6w5sx/sp
    Posts
    833
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's highly related to subtypes, yes, and probably base types as well.

    Examples:

    ILE-Ti are obviously more common in European Jews/Jewesses than in Palestinian Arabs. Anglo-Irish people were more likely to be ILE-Ti than the Irish Catholics they oppressed.

    SLE-Ti are more common in whites than in blacks.

    ESI-Se are more common in whites than blacks and they have a higher white to black ratio than ESI-Fi.

    LSI-Se were more common in Anglo-Irish people, LSI-Ti were more common in Irish Catholics.

    LSI-Ti were much more common among black slaves than LSI-Se.
    I'm sorry, but I'm psychologically disturbed.


  2. #2
    YXPR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    TIM
    INFp / VEFL
    Posts
    245
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Disturbed View Post
    It's highly related to subtypes, yes, and probably base types as well.

    Examples:

    ILE-Ti are obviously more common in European Jews/Jewesses than in Palestinian Arabs. Anglo-Irish people were more likely to be ILE-Ti than the Irish Catholics they oppressed.

    SLE-Ti are more common in whites than in blacks.

    ESI-Se are more common in whites than blacks and they have a higher white to black ratio than ESI-Fi.

    LSI-Se were more common in Anglo-Irish people, LSI-Ti were more common in Irish Catholics.

    LSI-Ti were much more common among black slaves than LSI-Se.
    This is so aggressively ignorant

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    EIE or ESI 6w5sx/sp
    Posts
    833
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YXPR View Post
    This is so aggressively ignorant
    lol.

    I don't have anything against Anglo-irish people, I don't think they were really more oppressive than anyone else really and I do think they were great and I'm glad I have no Irish Catholic ancestry, but I've been unhappy that I have matrilineal probable middle eastern catholic ancestry. It makes me feel racially inferior and envious of people I care about.

    FWIW, P.W. Botha was an LSI-Ti and he had lead the apartheid state. He was an idiot. Not all LSI-Ti are idiots; however I prefer the sensory subtype.

    Maybe I could change my mind about my post you quoted, but most of what I said certainly seems to be how it was to me. I don't want to give people the impression that I think I'm infallible, because I know I'm not and because I couldn't get ahead in life if people were to think I think that I'm infallible.
    I'm sorry, but I'm psychologically disturbed.


  4. #4
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,398
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Disturbed View Post
    It's highly related to subtypes, yes, and probably base types as well.

    Examples:

    ILE-Ti are obviously more common in European Jews/Jewesses than in Palestinian Arabs. Anglo-Irish people were more likely to be ILE-Ti than the Irish Catholics they oppressed.

    SLE-Ti are more common in whites than in blacks.

    ESI-Se are more common in whites than blacks and they have a higher white to black ratio than ESI-Fi.

    LSI-Se were more common in Anglo-Irish people, LSI-Ti were more common in Irish Catholics.

    LSI-Ti were much more common among black slaves than LSI-Se.
    Based

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •