Yes
No
I am not LII (I am a retard - I don't even know why I'm answering this poll to be honest)
And still neither you nor anyone else have presented any counter arguments, so I guess I am right as usual. James is an ILI, and his description does not fit the correctly typed LIIs on this forum, even though some of them incorrectly think so.Originally Posted by Logos
No. I just know how to spend my time efficiently, and arguing with you is not one of them.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Another irrelevant comment ... and no argument.
Good point. I have no argument. I am an ILI now. Deal with it.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Ooh,valuing! How exciting!
This is the new and improved ILI Logos you are seeing here.Ooh,
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Okay. You are an idiot then. An idiot without arguments.
Dear me! I've become Phaedrus!
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Hahahaha. No you haven't. You don't value "objective truth" enough. "Objective truth" is what it is because Phaedrus says it, remember?
JRiddy
—————King of Socionics—————
Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so
Indeed, look how ridiculous the discussion gets. Phaedrus makes no better case for James's description being one that only ILIs should correctly identify with than that he, Phaedrus, identifies with it. That's his very convenient, and easy, "argument". And we're supposed to prove that he's wrong.
I think that description is contradictory, and a lot of what it says is a lot of -- nothing. It's easy to get lost in it. However, why bother?
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote