ATTN INTjs LIIs do you identify with this description?

[Phaedrus]

What way did he write it? How is it ILI?

You don't answer my questions. What problems do you see with the description? How is it not ILI? I have already given an example in this thread of an aspect, pointed out by Expat, of how it is written, and that aspect is in itself an indication of ILI. Compare with how people perceive what I write as repeating the same thing(s) over and over again.

It is a real problem that people don't immediately recognize that type description as portraying an ILI, because it seems to prove that people don't know how to read a type description. Now, try to explain why you are not convinced that it is an ILI description,

[Mariano Rajoy]

Now, try to explain why you are not convinced that it is an ILI description,

I never asserted that it was not an ILI description.