Quote Originally Posted by Elro View Post
I think this is what you're saying, but just to clarify: INTP MBTI functional order is Ti-Ne-Si-Fe, I believe. (See: http://www.intp.org/intprofile.html, a particularly good description.) I think you're saying those are the labels but the functions described are Ni and Te in Socionics terms. Again, see the above link to see if you agree, if you're unfamiliar with the type.
I have commented on that type description of Paul James on several occasions on this forum. What he describes is a very clear example of an ILI. There is very much IP in that description, and in the Ti section he accentuates many of the most typical ILI themes. He also describes a person with a clear Objectivist outlook. Since it is so obvious that James is describing an ILI, what's the point of even discussing why he uses labels such as "Ti" and "Ne" to talk about the mental processes of an ILI?