Which is ... basically the same thing.Originally Posted by Brilliand
Probably. Acting obscure about clear-cut things irritates me.That probably suggests that she's Beta>Delta...
Which is ... basically the same thing.
Probably. Acting obscure about clear-cut things irritates me.That probably suggests that she's Beta>Delta...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Not sure what you're referring to. I don't think I've ignored anyone's remarks. If I have, it has been unintentional. Care to clarify?
You are assuming that I am purposely being obscure. But I guess this would irritate you, as your need for clear-cut things irritate me. I like your picture though.
You did not respond directly to any of these complaints about your contradictory signature:
INFp is IEI,.
EII is INFj,.
Your signature is incorrect
EII = INFj =
IEI = INFp =
On the other hand, you did respond in a way that showed that you had a reason to keep it contradictory, and I picked up on that.The problem isn't that your signature doesn't reflect your type. The problem is that it contradicts itself. In Socionics, INFp =
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
Are you kidding me? How more precise could I possibly be?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
What Brilliand said ...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I appreciate your giving me the benefit of the doubt. I guess some people (Johnny Depp) just assume the worst in others right off the bat. However, I assumed (apparently incorrectly) that people would read most of the posts in the thread, a couple of which already addressed the signature "thing". I honestly meant to respond to everyone once I got a chance, but my priority was to address those comments that had not been previously made. I find it interesting/humorous that you interpreted this as a sign of obscurity on my part. He he. I've enjoyed your posts. Look forward to continue hearing from ya!
Hahaha, you made me laugh.I guess some people (Johnny Depp
See, you're being obscure again.I read all the posts. (If you were indirectly referring to me)
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
LOL, but I wasn't....geez. Now you're paranoid. You're funny (seriously)....Johnny.Hahaha, you made me laugh.
See, you're being obscure again.
Thanks qbsirena06 for inquiring. For me, i just read your list of Beta vs Delta values and I am definitely not Delta, but Beta is not quite it either. I'm going to take a look at Alpha again.
Whatever is going on with us, it is VERY FREAKIN' similar! I read your posts and they are words out of my mouth, I just am a *bit* more "organized" about it.
Love
Kelly Jo
"I" am funny? Now how funny is that?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Very! Or to be more exact, about 87% of the time (crap, I'm afraid that's not clear-cut enough for you)."I" am funny? Now how funny is that?
hey qbsirena, I had the same problem as you for a long time but eventually I decided on INFj (not saying this will be what you'll do). Mainly I tried to observe people in real life and on the forum who fit the descriptions of Se dominant (ESTp and ESFp) and Te dominant (ESTj and ENTj), to see who I get along best with, and it ended up being the latter for me. I'm still not sure because I find myself in "Ni mode" a lot of the time, but for now I'm sticking with INFj.
Anyway, what I really wanted to say was regarding this, my INTj friend (though some here thought he was INFp), said the exact same thing: "ESTp sound like the typical bully". So I'm not sure whether there's just something in the descriptions which evokes this response, or whether its a meaningful response as a result of intertype relations (if he is INTj, ESTp would be his supervisor).This was a great suggestion. Based on my readings of both types, I can definitely conclude that I dislike ESTps the most. They seem like total jerks (no offense to anyone that might be one
Don't worry. Johnny loves you.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Interesting anecdote. I will pay closer attention to intertype relations. The concept is still new to me. Thanks for your suggestion!
Johnny does? Really? Can you be more specific?
You are Beta.Can you be more specific?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
LOL LOL LOL What makes you say that?
The InterType Relation™ between you and him.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
My mustache.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Is it common for Betas to like ISTPs? 'Cause I think I like Johnny. Still trying to make up my mind though. LOL. This is great.
That mustache of yours has a mind of its own. Impressive!
Johnny Depp is ISFp, not ISTp.
D-SEI
This is me and my dual being scientific together
That's why they call me Johnny.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Obscurely enough, that's not precisely true.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
[QUOTE=Kamangir;352491]Johnny Depp is ISFp, not ISTp.[/QUOTE
Which Johnny? My Johnny?
'Tis true, 'tis true indeed! So, I'm curious about something...
orly!!! We shall see.
D-SEI
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Wats dat, darlin'?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
How come I find you so charming?
You obviously adore mustache.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Wow! You read my mind! (swooning)
I love your sarcasm baby.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Are you being cynical? That's so unlike you.
And you were not?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Not at all. Yikes, I think I'm starting to annoy you OR confuse you, one of the two.
That's the intertype relation - mutual confusion. It's not that you won't like each other, it's just that you'll have trouble getting your point across.
Had to wait until I saw it happen again to mention it.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
I'm actually intending to be very playful (truthfully). Now I'm not sure if he's getting that.That's the intertype relation - mutual confusion. It's not that you won't like each other, it's just that you'll have trouble getting your point across.
Had to wait until I saw it happen again to mention it.
Then please accept my apologies, my little mermaid.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Well, let's put it this way: confusion annoys me.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
