club descriptions are part of classical socionics, but i'm at a loss for why people from similar clubs are likely to act similarly in any kind of significant way.
it's probably best not to pay too much attention to it.
club descriptions are part of classical socionics, but i'm at a loss for why people from similar clubs are likely to act similarly in any kind of significant way.
it's probably best not to pay too much attention to it.
No, sorry.
That's irrelevant. I can't force people to consider what I have to say, but they would benefit from doing it -- if they are interested in getting the types right. They would certainly not learn more by listening to what you have to say, because you have still some things to learn when it comes to the types. You still make typing mistakes now and then.Originally Posted by niffweed17
I think the point of clubs is to divide the types based on the strength of their functions.
Having functions of the same strength allows them to understand the same things, and this makes it more likely for them to engage in the same activities.
Obviously people of the same club but different quadra will have a different take on those activities, and will enjoy them for different reasons (which could go beyond socionics).
LSI
Assuming that the ego and id functions are strong, you may well be inclined to give preference to activities/interests related to those functions. However, they "act similarly" only in a superficial way, a sort of first impression.
Sure.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied