Originally Posted by Logos
Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.
I pity your souls
Yeah, I find them too stereotypical. Controlling for mixed subtype probably makes them work more easily ex. a Ti-ISTj would be a cross between researcher and pragmatist in terms of interests, a Te-ENTj same, a Si-ESTj a cross between pragmatist and social, a mixed subtype should fit perfectly the description. I would peg myself as inbetween pragmatist and researcher, even if I shun both super nerdy activities and (bleah) sport cars gatherings.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Although the club descriptions on wiki are perhaps not perfect, they are fairly accurate.
I think that the fact that Ezra identifies with NT more than ST probably means it's more likely he's mistyping himself as ST as opposed to us re-writing the wiki descriptions because he wants an ST club to look like an NT description
But ok, they may be generalizing to a point, but then they have to, to a point. I know plenty beta ST's that fit the ST description better than the NT description. Just a thought.
@jriddy, I may be wrong here, but you seem to be assuming Phaedrus doesn't understand, why? From what I can tell he hasn't described
Why haven't you left like everyone else in this thread?
Why don´t you go fuck your wife?
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
15k posts n u havent learnd anything in the last 10 yrs. SAD!
Yeah teach me then. What should I learn specifically?
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
The proper names for the clubs are:
Imaginative Ethicists - The Theocrats
Observative Logicians - The Bureaucrats
Imaginative Logicians - The Technocrats
Observative Ethicists - The Utilitarians
Last edited by domr; 06-25-2018 at 01:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
