pointless subtype experiment

[aestrivex]

i went through my userlist on wikisocion and forced myself to give every user on it a subtype. in doing so, i used the following definition of subtype: whichever function is more emphasized or apparent in the person's persona. this definition is intentionally vague.

here is the result, not to be taken with any degree of seriousness. i'm not even sure i agree with a few of the base typings in it at this point.

anndelise: ILE-Ne
bee: SEI-Fe
bionicgoat: SEI-Si
cracka: ESE-Si
dee: SEI-Fe
dioklecian: LII-Ti
elro: ILE-Ne
gilly: ILE-Ti
hkkmr: ILE-Ti
jxrtes: ILE-Ne
kamangir: SEI-Fe
labcoat: LII-Ti
logos: LII-Ne
lokivanguard: SEI-Si
machintruc: LII-Ti
ms kensington: LII-Ti
science as magic: LII-Ne
slava: ILE-Ne
steve: ILE-Ne
strrrng: LII-Ti
thehotelambush: LII-Ne
themime: SEI-Si

ashton: SLE-Se
baby: IEI-Ni
bulletsanddoves: IEI-Fe
drd252: SLE-Ti
elena: EIE-Fe
eliphalet: IEI-Ni
ESTP: SLE-Se
eunice: IEI-Fe
ezra: SLE-Ti
garmonbozia: IEI-Ni
herzy: SLE-Se
hitta: IEI-Ni
jadae: EIE-Fe
jarno: IEI-Ni
jessica: LSI-Se
jimbean: LSI-Se
kristiina: EIE-Ni
loki: IEI-Fe
mercutio: SLE-Se
misutii: IEI-Ni
mustachio: SLE-Se
nerv_damage: IEI-Ni
onetreehilluver: EIE-Ni
phaedrus: LSI-Ti
potatospirit: LSI-Ti
redbaron: IEI-Fe
rocky: LSI-Ti
smilingeyes: LSI-Ti
starfall: IEI-Ni
sunshine lively: SLE-Ti
UDP: LSI-Ti
vague: IEI-Ni

blauritson: ILI-Te
cogsci: ILI-Te
diana: ESI-Fi
expat: LIE-Te
FDG: SEE-Se
iconoclast IX: ILI-Te
implied: ILI-Ni
jonathan: ILI-Ni
joy: LIE-Ni
khamelion: SEE-Fi
kspin: ILI-Ni (possibly the least confident subtyping of any)
liveandletlive: SEE-Fi
niffweed17: ILI-Te
quirk satellite div: ILI-Te
reyn_til_runa: ILI-Ni
salawa: ILI-Ni
scarlettlux: SEE-Se
xiuxiu: ILI-Te
XoX: ILI-Ni

aut0: LSE-Si
heath: SLI-Te
minde: EII-Fi
munenori2: EII-Ne
rick: IEE-Fi
rita: EII-Ne
rmcnew: EII-Fi
slacker mom: IEE-Ne
snegledmaca: SLI-Te
subterranean: EII-Fi
tereg: IEE-Fi

[Creepy-Cyclops]

Was sure I was registered as a user also

[munenori2]

SubT as an Fi sub-t?

Interesting, because his Ne seems far more evident to me. I figured that might be one reason why he seemed to go back and forth with INTj not so recently.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

Yeah, I'd regard myself as more of a Ne subtype for both the INTj and INFj descriptions, though I suppose it's a matter of perception and context and degree etc.

[Lotus]

I'm not on it.

[Creepy-bg]

I'm not on it.

you must not be important enough

[aestrivex]

Yeah, I'd regard myself as more of a Ne subtype for both the INTj and INFj descriptions, though I suppose it's a matter of perception and context and degree etc.

and why is that?

[jessica129]

And you are wrong yet again.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

Yeah, I'd regard myself as more of a Ne subtype for both the INTj and INFj descriptions, though I suppose it's a matter of perception and context and degree etc.

and why is that?

Well, comparing the Valentine Meged & Anatoly Ovcharov subtype descriptions, there are bits of the ethical subtype that don't strongly fit me (while the Ne description describes me better):

I perserve with work for longer than most people, but I am not 'very' hardworking.

I am firm in my principles, but only when I am sure what they are.

I do not lack the ability to joke or flatter, though I have a rather blustery way of doing these things.

I do gesticulate when I'm talking, in a a rather robotic kind of way - to emphasise a point, I might upturn the palm of a hand or something. But not in a particularly significant way.

I probably smile more frequently than 'they seldom smile', but it really depends.

In the descriptions of 'sexual behaviour', the Ne description describes me very well when I'm with people I trust, whereas the Fi description is problematic in some places: I do not require 'proofs of love', or at least I don't demand them.

I could go into greater depth, but it'll probably just get boring.

[Joy]

I don't really think of myself as having a subtype. I think I'm probably more Ni than most LIE's, but I relate more to Te subtype descriptions. Doesn't really matter either way.

[PotatoSpirit]

I've just learned to recognize the types, it's probably gonna take me 16 times the typings to decide if subtypes exist.
That being said, If I was to choose one blindly I'd be a Ti subtype.

[Lotus]

I've changed your list in the interests of being annoying...

Someone add me on!
I just registered.

[aestrivex]

Was sure I was registered as a user also

not interested. I'm not on this list.

I'm not on it.

Someone add me on!
I just registered.

my list refers to my userlist at wikisocion. which you are not on because i'm not claiming to know what type you are.

[Garmonbozia]

my list refers to my userlist at wikisocion. which you are not on because i'm not claiming to know what type you are.

I don't have a wikisocion account because I don't give a flying fuck about socionics. If I have an account there it's because Hugo made one in my name as he was prone to do. So uh.. if you're tying the Garmonbozia on wikisocion you're typing him (or MAYBE someone else) not me.

[Joy]

I don't have a wikisocion account because I don't give a flying fuck about socionics. If I have an account there it's because Hugo made one in my name as he was prone to do. So uh.. if you're tying the Garmonbozia on wikisocion you're typing him (or MAYBE someone else) not me.

You've misunderstood.

[aestrivex]

I don't have a wikisocion account because I don't give a flying fuck about socionics. If I have an account there it's because Hugo made one in my name as he was prone to do. So uh.. if you're tying the Garmonbozia on wikisocion you're typing him (or MAYBE someone else) not me.

i'm typing you. it doesn't matter whether you have an account or not.

[Garmonbozia]

i'm typing you. it doesn't matter whether you have an account or not.

But you said that you are exclusively typing people with user accounts on that wiki. I don't have one.

So you are either NOT typing people who are only on the wiki list or I AM on the wiki list with an account that I didn't make.

[aestrivex]

i expected all of this bullshit. i was also expecting some amounts of semi-constructive commentary, but i suppose that was naive.


this was more about the subtypes of some of those people on the list than about changing the people on the list or adding new people. instead... some of the changes that loki made i could sort of live with or am ambivalent towards because they were not confident anyway. others i'm less happy about. at least three of the changes i would veto as immediately insensible.

but then again, loki's changes obviously reflect her views and not mine.

[marooned]

i expected all of this bullshit. i was also expecting some amounts of semi-constructive commentary, but i suppose that was naive.

I don't think everyone would have a subtype.

[aestrivex]

I don't think everyone would have a subtype.

and what is your rationale for that?

[Creepy-Cyclops]

i expected all of this bullshit. i was also expecting some amounts of semi-constructive commentary, but i suppose that was naive.

If you expected it then why did you not explain that in your initial post

I've changed your list in the interests of being annoying.

Why'd you not put me on?

[aestrivex]

If you expected it then why did you not explain that in your initial post

what are you even talking about

[Creepy-Cyclops]

what are you even talking about

This:

i expected all of this bullshit

if you expected it why didn't you do something to fix it beforehand?

[Creepy-Cyclops]

--