A thing I've thought about, is that the 16 types systems take a lot of things for granted.
Maybe these subtypes does not exist, in the way the system makes it.
The thing I'm thinking about, is that some functions go more together than others.
When someone say intuitive thinker to me, I mostly think of someone
![Ne2](images/smilies/Ne2.gif)
+
![Introverted Logic](images/smilies/Ti.gif)
, I dont see
![Extroverted Logic](images/smilies/Te.gif)
as a very creative thinking process, and neigher do I see
![Introverted Intuition](images/smilies/Ni.gif)
as very perceptive about people and situation. When I think of someone bright, quick and perceptive, I mostly think of the two functions of
![Ne2](images/smilies/Ne2.gif)
and
![Introverted Logic](images/smilies/Ti.gif)
, someone who have dominating
![Extroverted Logic](images/smilies/Te.gif)
, tend to be far more subjetive than someone with a dominating
![Ne2](images/smilies/Ne2.gif)
, those with dominant
![Ne2](images/smilies/Ne2.gif)
+
![Introverted Logic](images/smilies/Ti.gif)
tend to be the best observers, or that's how I see it. And talk about a creative thinker, and I've give you someone who is
![Introverted Logic](images/smilies/Ti.gif)
.