Discuss. Because I want some attention too!
What makes you think you're Gamma rather than Beta? Forgive me if you've already answered this elsewhere; I don't keep up with type threads very often.
ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
5w4 so/sx
"IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"
Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
Stickam music performances
lol, well, I don't feel it but then again I'm useless at picking up vibes from people. Nevertheless, unless I see something to disprove it, I shall acknowledge your transition to Gammahood. Gammahood.. I like that word.. there's something to it.Originally Posted by ScarlettLux
ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
5w4 so/sx
"IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"
Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
Stickam music performances
Yep, Scarlett, I agree you're a clear-cut INTp if there ever was one.
SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype
Are you more chaotic or reserved?
Do you prefer originality and non-conformity, or do you prefer to fit in and be normal?
Are you more optimistic or do you have more of a depressive/negativist view of life?(glass half empty or full)
Are you aggressive and rebellious or more passive/defensive and submissive?
Do you become addicted to sensations and love euphoria?
Do you have a hard time doing routine things, like getting out of bed or cleaning?
Are you impulsive or patient?
Do you find the faults with things or do you notice the positives in things first?
Are you more commonsense smart or very analytical and deducing?
What is your political orientation?
Are you afraid of death?
Do you consider yourself confident most of the time or do you feel like the world can be unpredictable?
Do you see all the possibilities and sometimes are afraid of them?
Do you have any OCD tendencies?
Do you have a need to be perfect?
Model X Will Save Us!
*randomwarelinkremoved
Welcome.
Answering any of hitta's questions excludes you from Gamma.
I guess you aren't Gamma then, because you answered mine.
Model X Will Save Us!
*randomwarelinkremoved
I'd definitely say SEE > any other Gamma type.
I'm not sure if this topic is serious or not, but I have no trouble at all seeing you as an SEE, ScarlettLux. It makes more sense to me than Beta NF. I don't have a strong opinion on this though. I don't know you well enough.
Surprisingly enough, this thread IS serious ... disguised as not serious because I just don't have the energy to attempt to prove why I think I am not Beta NF. It would seem ludicrous to too many people who I've asserted my Beta-ness to.
Why do you think SEE makes most sense for me? I think that as well.
ETA: I think I have really misinterpretedin the Ego versus
Surprisingly enough, this thread IS serious ... disguised as not serious because I just don't have the energy to attempt to prove why I think I am not Beta NF. It would seem ludicrous to too many people who I've asserted my Beta-ness to.
Why do you think SEE makes most sense for me? I think that as well.
ETA: I think I have really misinterpreted
Well I sure hope your as prepared as I am to go through all the bullshit "people" will give you that is obviously part of the process of changing quadras and clubs and everything else.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I doubt she'll get the kind of resistance you have. I don't think there any blatant reasons she isn't SEE. (And she's never been *sure* of her type, which doesn't make a difference to me but it may to some.)
Don't you meanSurprisingly enough, this thread IS serious ... disguised as not serious because I just don't have the energy to attempt to prove why I think I am not Beta NF. It would seem ludicrous to too many people who I've asserted my Beta-ness to.
Why do you think SEE makes most sense for me? I think that as well.
ETA: I think I have really misinterpretedin the ego. And also SEE-s have
And I too don't really see problems with seeing you as SEE.
Woops! I mean yeah =]Don't you mean
And I too don't really see problems with seeing you as SEE.
Wow, really? I was totally expecting people to start bashing me ...
Actually... what about the LSI-s? Or do your misinterpretations of the IM-s run deep?
I don't really have a good explanation. It's just an impression I get from your manner of speech.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
:" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"