I think owl is so/sx 6w7, 694
I think owl is so/sx 6w7, 694
Another typing list from the adorkable typing fairy. Welcome back princess... <3
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Wow. Aylen is closing in on her ten thousandth shit post. That's what happens when you don't have a life. You average five or six posts a day on an online forum for five straight years (about 1,825 days)!
Btw it's a great example of nine sloth. Just running on autopilot like that mentally and physically. It's like a total absence of willpower (which is part of the nine problem).
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
@Kill4Me are you the person with the stackemup website?
olimpia: so/sx 4w3 479 for the 100939209th time. i've lost count on all the times she's talked about her problems with escapism and fear of being in pain because of being rejected etc.
starfall/fox: sx 9w1 953, alternatively 952
Last edited by maniac; 01-29-2018 at 09:28 PM.
New List Additions: Idontgiveaf, Vogue Paris, Scarper, Tela
Idontgiveaf: 9w8 so/sx
Vogue Paris: 2w3 sp/so
Scarper: 9w8 so/sp
Tela: 6w7 sp/so
that's pretty funny I have to say
No way in hell that @Chae is EIE. But eh, you have your own typing system for sure.
I'm using classical theory and common typing methods. IEE is doubtful to behave so senselessly rude and hence against Fi as to be emotionally nice and polite is what related to Fi. While you being possible beta is hard to understand what is wrong with Chae to fit my delta values.
Chae is just weird to be delta F and my activator and you have no significant base to be sure in her type without video.
EIE is the most possible, taking into account her F like behavior and weird (in my perception) F itself.
It's a bit complicated if we look at the link you provided... For ISxx types the functions are definitely not the same in MBTI vs Socionics like I said before in other posts (it used to be a big discussion topic for me), yet, if you look at ISxJ being E1 and E6 and then IxTPs being E5, a simple correlation between MBTI and Socionics won't work at all, either going by dichotomy or by function stacks. Si base in Socionics can't be either E1 or E5, right?... My suspicion is that these typings are conflated with some other things beyond functions, e.g. instinct stackings and other motivations. No other explanation for this.
You know there is more to people than functions. I knew an IEE (98% sure on IEE) that pretty much had borderline personality disorder too. It wasn't an emotionally nice and polite Fi due to that.
Using the classic theory without consideration for other psychological variables outside Socionics will result in a lot of contradictions. It is simply impossible to fit all people to that theory without issues.
I know that you have nothing reasonable to insist that Chae's type is IEE and impossible to be EIE. And having nothing you are trying just to "say something" to protect Chae's opinion as possibly having personal sympathy to her weird F emotionality. As you are possible Ti, then try to think why Fi type is so sympathic for you.
I find she's focused on her personal sentiments more than on the more "impersonal" Fe dynamic emotional expressions. She throws around Ne ideas without a unifying Ni thread to them that would be compatible with an Se worldview.
And lol, how you said you know that I would have nothing reasonable... are you god or what to believe you can read my mind? You were wrong.
I agree, @Chae 's Fi is very obvious. I did wonder if it would be possible she's SEE-Fi or smthng close, because she's similar to woof and (mostly) because she VI's distinctly SEE-Fi/ESI -Se imo.
I just see Chae constantly focusing on emotions - bright sparkles and funs posts and smiley gifs, if there's what socionics calls Fi, then it's hidden. Still, whatever type she wishes to be, it's all good.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Very obvious is that another beta shows sympathy to Chae from "opposite" quadra, while don't noticing how weird she's in F.
I feel this stuff by my heart unlike you and that rises my chances to be true in this.
> because she's similar to woof and (mostly) because she VI's distinctly SEE-Fi/ESI -Se imo.
ESI... my holly ESI... *facepalm*
NO!
VI should be done with video or IRL, anyway
*waiting homevideo of Chae in her hopeless try to proof her IEEness*
I still have in mind to write a proper reply to the questions people come up with as reaction to my posts in this thread. But I want to start a new thread to stop any further derailment of the topic, because it seems quite off-topic in this thread.
btw. any suggestions for my enneagram type?
I still planing to make a video but my data transfer capacity and upload speed is quite limited at the moment. I've to wait for a faster (upload) internet connection to post a video.
New SP/SO Additions
Troll NR 007: 7w6 sp/so
Penny Dreadful: 4w5 sp/so
Olimpia: 3w4 sp/so
“They find subtle and not so subtle ways to represent themselves as winners. They use their accomplishments to court attention, admirers, and "VIP" benefits.”
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...78#post1173178
Olimpia is a clear as day 3w4 sp/so. It's like in almost every instance of her board activity you can see an example of it if you know what to look for.
As an example, most recently, Olimpia said on this thread that she typed "countless celebrities." Given that the Stackemup Enneagram and Typewatch Enneagram type lists number well over 2000 a piece and the old Socionix list I think went over 3000, I was curious how many she regarded as countless. I clicked on her VIP blog or something and I notice the layout was rather decorative, which looks stylish and fits with my typing of her as type 3 (the marketing orientation) but makes it more time consuming to find out her typings and the "countless celebrities" she has typed. I also didn't see any introduction detailing her typing methodology or her sources but learned that she views these celebrities as "very important people" as opposed to non-celebrities (4w5s aren't impressed with celebrities to that degree). There was only about 280 celebrity typings on her very important people blog. I thought it would be more, but I suppose "countless" is relative. Of course, it could be she's typed more on her own that she doesn't list. Threes will exaggerate their efforts to reinforce their own feelings of superiority and impress others. The site is rather stylish. R & H point out in personality types that type 3 embodies the style-over-substance mantra more so than any other type, especially 4w5 but the way she sizes types up comes across too unintuitive for a 4w5. It's just beginner stuff, stereotypes. And clearly, Olimpia is not in the reactive triad.
Olimpia also offers a service where, if you pay her money, she will type you, so there's business logic involved (sp/so is entrepreneurial). Go here for my take on the quality of Olimpia's typings included in my view of her socionics type.
Anyways what I just described above is a pattern you can find reoccurring in different forms throughout Olimpia's posts. The content changes, but the underlying dynamic is the same. The only other way to account for all this from Olimpia is too type her SEE. SEE has some superficial overlap with type 3 and type 7. However, Olimpia is clearly an introvert, so the only real option is 3w4 sp/so. She also types Teal Swan an IEI, and teal swan is clearly a 3w4 sp/so but not IEI (go here for my take of Teal's type), so it would make sense that what she's identifying in herself as relating to Teal Swan pertains to enneagram type.
Last edited by Kill4Me; 02-13-2018 at 08:14 PM.
cuivienen: sp/sx and probably 9. the overly exaggerated focus on trying to be seen here, seems like a counter-phobic 9 thing where you're so afraid to not be seen which is 9 (see: soul child of enneagram 9, three). i've seen it before with people of that combination and mostly when they have a secondary 3 fix.
there's something about sp/sx 9 in partiucularly who are often are the aggressive 9s online
9 is part of the gut center. The gut centers main emotion is anger. 9 suppresses anger. So it builds up and the anger needs an outlet, which commonly is the internet since it feels like a safe-space.
Sp/sx in my experience and opinion is a pretty angry stacking. It's 5-like and can sometimes be oblivious to what it looks like because they're so submerged in their own selves because of being SP first and social last. For example, I type Elliot Rodger as sp/sx 3w4. Anyway, so this being an angry stacking and 9 suppressing aggression makes it especially reasonable for sp/sx 9 to be very aggressive online. Which is what I have experienced.
That cuivienen types 4 I find very funny, because he's not fourish at all, he always brags about himself and thinks he should have any girl in the world. In other words, he does not embrace the outcast/loser/tragic problem that cant be fixed- motif of type 4 at all. I used to think he was a 3 but the overt focus on trying to expand himself and be like "i AM visible" reads 9 to me and I've seen it before - also I doubt a 3 would mistype as 4, but 9s mistype as 4 alot. But I'm still open for core 3 for him.
I'm sure of him being sp/sx though, he has that obliviousness sp/sx can have about how ridiculous and stupid he looks, and also there's no way he's sp last, he talks about business ALOT.
Last edited by maniac; 02-21-2018 at 02:35 PM.
The irony, this is style over substance typing. Behaviour and motivation often don't overlap, if you can somehow prove her goal is to be impressive just by being a celeb typer with a nice-looking site that would be quite a feat. If anything, that's her primary social instinct. You try to see the "countless" as some sort of deception dynamic but that's nickpicking, it's irrelevant, she did not claim she's the best site ever which would be more 3-like. So what if she doesn't explain her typings, that points more to the logics/ethics divide, and her influence of E5 possibly withholding knowledge. Let's start there. Maybe asking for the reason why she made the site this way helps a lot more to find out what the core fear for instance is. It sounds as if you take what you don't like and throw it into a typing, all very dubious but that we already know.
Last edited by Chae; 02-21-2018 at 02:45 PM.
I type Olimpia/Cassandra/Sisofnight a clear 4w3
He's not the best typer, but he is also probably confusing the social instinct with 3, plus she has a 3 wing
Olimpia is a woman... unless she had a gender change surgery very recently, which a seriously doubt.
Tela is referring to Kill4me