How Enneagram 279-135-468 triads act sociologically

[Cuddly McFluffles]

OK, I'm taking issue.

468 - Reactive Triad

- Seeks to be respected, empathy doesn't seem to mean anything

Is this something you can prove? Do you have actual evidence or sufficient data that you can show me?

[zenbrat]

My God, Loki. I laughed so hard that I nearly wet my chair

I am now on my way to teach others the complexities of sharpening pencils.

[Ezra]

I never said that I was CP6.

...

And?

[machintruc]

...

And?

CP6's are totally stupid. I have nothing to do with them.

[Ezra]

CP6's are totally stupid.

You evidently have some misconceptions about the counterphobic Six.

[machintruc]

You evidently have some misconceptions about the counterphobic Six.

Friendly CP6's are quite unfrequent, it's difficult to avoid such misconceptions.

One exception was some priest whom I recently made a confession. He was LIE. He's not very "friendly", but at least, he wasn't harmful to me.

Another exception was a female math teacher I had. She was LIE. She was pretty mistrusting and passionate (like EIE's), but had some esteem for me because I was a quite good student.

Another exception would be my father, but I still hesitate between CP6 and 8, so I can't count him for now.


Besides, the "" meant that I was joking. Reactive types have an hard time to recognise jokes.

[machintruc]

RECENT RESEARCH : Serotonin Levels and The origin of conformism

In any group, we can calculate the Social Component Ratios.

Let's call them SCR-, SCR0, and SCR+. They are rates of individuals

In the G group, there are 4 Reactives, 2 Neutrals, and 3 Proactives.

The SCR- is equal to 0.4
The SCR0 is equal to 0.2
The SCR+ is equal to 0.3

If one of these rates is too high, unhealthy conformism may emerge. Especially if concerned individuals are low-functioning.

If it's the SCR-, hostile conformism may emerge. Nobody will really make the group evolve, and will follow a blind social path, because of fear of being harmed. This is frequent in gangs, and probably in jail.

If it's the SCR0, cold conformism may emerge. Nobody will really make the group evolve, and will follow a blind social path, because of fear of being perceived as dumb.

If it's the SCR+, socialite conformism may emerge. Nobody will really make the group evolve, and will follow a blind social path, because of fear of being perceived as a spoilsport.


The only way to prevent social paralysis is : removing unhealthy elements. That may sound harsh, but permitting a group to be harmed may render the group unstable.


EDIT:

For 279's, it won't appear that bad, because such group members are more easily deindividuated - and usually, the result isn't worse than retarded trends and bankruptcy-ridden stagnation.

For 468's, deindividuation is difficult to almost impossible, and people will fake accomodation (especially Sixes - despite common descriptions, they aren't adaptive more than superficially). Stress and heavy conflicts may emerge. For example, gangs illustrate this pretty well.