Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 48 of 48

Thread: How Enneagram 279-135-468 triads act sociologically

  1. #41
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bassano del Grappa, Via Rodolfi 35
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,835
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryene Astraelis View Post
    Then given the connotation of "hostile", I think a different term ought to be used.
    hos·tile /ˈhɒstl or, especially Brit., -taɪl/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[hos-tl or, especially Brit., -tahyl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
    –adjective
    1. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of an enemy: a hostile nation.
    2. opposed in feeling, action, or character; antagonistic: hostile criticism.
    3. characterized by antagonism.
    4. not friendly, warm, or generous; not hospitable.
    –noun
    5. a person or thing that is antagonistic or unfriendly.
    6. Military. an enemy soldier, plane, ship, etc.
    [Origin: 1585–95; < L hostīlis, equiv. to hostis enemy (see host2) + -īlis -ile]

    —Related forms
    hos&#183;tile&#183;ly, adverb

    —Synonyms 1. warlike, aggressive. 2. adverse, averse, contrary. Hostile, inimical indicate that which characterizes an enemy or something injurious to one's interests. Hostile applies to the spirit, attitude, or action of an enemy: They showed a hostile and menacing attitude. Inimical applies to an antagonistic or injurious tendency or influence: Their remarks were inimical to his reputation.
    —Antonyms 1, 2. friendly. 3. sympathetic.

    This seems enough to me. Hostile is quite good I think.

    We could also say that some types are more aggressive and intimidate people without wanting to. This doesn't change the fact that interacting with them is less pleasurable than interacting with a person that is not aggressive.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  2. #42
    So fluffeh. Cuddly McFluffles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    2,792
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG View Post
    hos·tile /ˈhɒstl or, especially Brit., -taɪl/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[hos-tl or, especially Brit., -tahyl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
    –adjective
    1. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of an enemy: a hostile nation.
    2. opposed in feeling, action, or character; antagonistic: hostile criticism.
    3. characterized by antagonism.
    4. not friendly, warm, or generous; not hospitable.
    –noun
    5. a person or thing that is antagonistic or unfriendly.
    6. Military. an enemy soldier, plane, ship, etc.
    [Origin: 1585–95; < L hostīlis, equiv. to hostis enemy (see host2) + -īlis -ile]

    —Related forms
    hos·tile·ly, adverb

    —Synonyms 1. warlike, aggressive. 2. adverse, averse, contrary. Hostile, inimical indicate that which characterizes an enemy or something injurious to one's interests. Hostile applies to the spirit, attitude, or action of an enemy: They showed a hostile and menacing attitude. Inimical applies to an antagonistic or injurious tendency or influence: Their remarks were inimical to his reputation.
    —Antonyms 1, 2. friendly. 3. sympathetic.

    This seems enough to me. Hostile is quite good I think.

    We could also say that some types are more aggressive and intimidate people without wanting to. This doesn't change the fact that interacting with them is less pleasurable than interacting with a person that is not aggressive.
    Hostility has always seemed to be a conscious, intentional thing, imo.
    Johari/Nohari

    "Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."

    Fruit, the fluffy kitty.

  3. #43
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you think of the 4th definition here when you say "hostile", then I agree. That definition hadn't even crossed my mind though. I think of someone who is "hostile" as someone who's antagonistic.

    I still think the description I quoted is that of an unhealthy person. Granted, certain types tend to be unhealthy in certain ways.

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    I think you're E3.
    Have fun with that.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  4. #44
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    If you think of the 4th definition here when you say "hostile", then I agree. That definition hadn't even crossed my mind though. I think of someone who is "hostile" as someone who's antagonistic.

    I still think the description I quoted is that of an unhealthy person. Granted, certain types tend to be unhealthy in certain ways.
    All non-salesmen are hostile, then.

    By "hostile", I meant "socially mistrusting and repulsive". In fact, 468's are socially repulsive by their nature. Their philosophy of life is built on conflict and rejection.

    Talanov has done empirical research that says that "tendency to hostility" was correlated to : SLE, LSI, and ILI. I agree with him.


    Have fun with that.
    You can't be Eight. You're too girly to be Eight. Three is girlier.

    just kidding

  5. #45
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    All non-salesmen are hostile, then.

    By "hostile", I meant "socially mistrusting and repulsive". In fact, 468's are socially repulsive by their nature. Their philosophy of life is built on conflict and rejection.

    Talanov has done empirical research that says that "tendency to hostility" was correlated to : SLE, LSI, and ILI. I agree with him.
    Like I said, certain types are more prone to certain flaws. I don't think that all 468's are socially repulsive though. That's a relative perspective based on individual values.

    You can't be Eight. You're too girly to be Eight. Three is girlier.

    just kidding
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...379#post329379
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  6. #46
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    Like I said, certain types are more prone to certain flaws. I don't think that all 468's are socially repulsive though. That's a relative perspective based on individual values.
    I always found it harder to socialise with 468's.

    To make a comparison : I have known a SEI +0- female schoolmate who, though appeared hard to get or something, was actually very accessible. She was the friend of nearly everyone. She was smart and funny, and very sociable. She was just unassertive and self-effaced, letting others to take her for granted.

    I have known another SEI --- chick. She's friendly... only when interest is strong. She's hostile, at least with me. Why does she need to be hostile ? I don't understand. She's everything but accomodating, and has stayed in social services department in her youth. She's overly sensitive, and reacts whenever teased or something. She's not really anyone's friend, but has sweet responses when needed. One day, she said to me that she was kicked out her school. Ok, she's straightforward and smart, but I don't really care, because she's an egocentric asocial. I don't really like her.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •