Mon soeur

[Kristiina]

Hmmmm in my rl experience with EIEs they don't always realize they're manipulating you. It's more like second nature, and they're a bit bewildered when you say "Stop treading on me already!!".

yeah, but is this Gilly's second nature as well?

[Gilly]

Hmmm.........actually on second thought I think he's been cleverly manipulating us with this whole thread. So, yes.

You have no idea...bwahahahahha.

[munenori2]

Hmmmm in my rl experience with EIEs they don't always realize they're manipulating you. It's more like second nature, and they're a bit bewildered when you say "Stop treading on me already!!".

[munenori2]

[Rick]

true, though why then he puts a restriction on wikisocion? why not open-source his new test's algorithm? why not add rating under his type gallery photoes? why ask for opinions on types when to later only remain fixated on some other self-generated option only? why ehmm... ok i give up.

Well, you can't please everyone... Especially when the underlying reason of their dislike is competition for influence. Even if I did all those things, you would find other reasons to criticize my work.

Gilly, Kristiina did a decent job of analyzing the description (better than I could, at least). I don't feel like I have anything new to add at the moment.

[marooned]

Meh. It's his (and whoever helped) freaking test. He doesn't have to reveal anything about it if he doesn't want to. I can't see any way in which he's somehow obligated to share how it calculates responses. And even if he were to share that, I don't see how it would be all that beneficial. Frankly, since it's his (and whoever helped) original work... I think it's best not to share that information. Just my $0.01.

[Kristiina]

...
Gilly, Kristiina did a decent job of analyzing the description (better than I could, at least). I don't feel like I have anything new to add at the moment.

oh wow, thank you. It means a lot coming from someone I see as almost socionics guru.