tcaudilllg seems incredibly LSI

[aestrivex]

import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
import cs1.Keyboard;

public class chore {

  private int choreNum;
  private int cost;
  private ArrayList<Integer> dependencies;
  
  public chore(int number) {
    choreNum = number;
    dependencies = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    System.out.println("Enter time for chore " + (choreNum + 1));
    cost = Keyboard.readInt();
    
    if (number == 0)
      dependencies.add(0);
    else {
      System.out.println("tEnter any dependencies or 0 to stop");
      boolean keepGoing = true;
      Integer input;
      while (keepGoing) {
        input = Keyboard.readInt();
        dependencies.add(input - 1);//the index of the first process is 0, so the user sees process n as process n+1.  correct for that by subtracting 1 here.
        if (input.equals((Integer) 0))
          keepGoing = false;
      }
    }
  }
  
  public int getCost() {
    return cost;
  }
  
  public int getChoreNum() {
    return choreNum;
  }
  
  public int getArg(int index) {
    int f = dependencies.get(index);
    return f;
  }
  
  public int getArgsSize() {
    return dependencies.size();
  }
  
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    System.out.println("This doesn't do anything.  Run the chores file instead.");
  }
}

[jessica129]

I find it funny how if anyone repeatidly asserts an idea here, they are automatically "" and therefore "LSI". What a load of bullshit. If any of you want to see how a real LSI acts, just look at PotatoSpirit, Five, or any of the other self-proclaimed LSIs here. They're actually quite easygoing and amiable. You're all relying way too heavily on stereotypes of LSIs as being brutish and close-minded, which clearly is more of a minority case.

Yes.

[Slacker]

I think he's Ne and Ti together. He comes up with all these ideas, and is continually thinking of where different possibilities might logically lead.

[marooned]

I think Tcaudilllg posts a lot of abstract theoretical generalized stuff. This to me says TiNe or NeTi.

[Logos]

I find it funny how if anyone repeatidly asserts an idea here, they are automatically "" and therefore "LSI". What a load of bullshit. If any of you want to see how a real LSI acts, just look at PotatoSpirit, Five, or any of the other self-proclaimed LSIs here. They're actually quite easygoing and amiable. You're all relying way too heavily on stereotypes of LSIs as being brutish and close-minded, which clearly is more of a minority case.

I agree that it's stupid. TC rambles in a way that no LSI would. His voice in writing also lacks any real (or threatening) sense of . Authoritative in his judgments, but authority lacking that touch, though this could be due to my own (at times) blindness to matters.

[krieger]

I agree that it's stupid. TC rambles in a way that no LSI would. His voice in writing also lacks any real (or threatening) sense of . Authoritative in his judgments, but authority lacking that touch, though this could be due to my own (at times) blindness to matters.

But now that the issue has been raised, would you say he "rambles" in the way the average INTj would...? How many INTjs do we see regularly writing up narratives as lengthy as his? Aren't INTjs ordinarily more concise than that?

If he is wrong about his type, I would count it most likely that he is ENFj. He already acknowledges ENFj-like behaviors in himself, calling ENFj his slave type.

Did anyone notice ENFjs are characteristically known for being obsessed with good and evil, just like TC is? There are bound to be some other convergences to be found between his behavior and that of ENFjs: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.1.types/index.html

[Logos]

But now that the issue has been raised, would you say he "rambles" in the way the average INTj would...? How many INTjs do we see regularly writing up narratives as lengthy as his? Aren't INTjs ordinarily more concise than that?

If he is wrong about his type, I would count it most likely that he is ENFj. He already acknowledges ENFj-like behaviors in himself, calling ENFj his slave type.

Did anyone notice ENFjs are characteristically known for being obsessed with good and evil, just like TC is? There are bound to be some other convergences to be found between his behavior and that of ENFjs: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.1.types/index.html

Well nowhere did I say that he was an INTj, but merely that the appears to be weak. ENFj is certainly a possibility for TC.

[tcaudilllg]

This thread seems to me to say more about the ignorance of the participants regarding socionics, than it does about my type.

[Logos]

This thread seems to me to say more about the ignorance of the participants regarding socionics, than it does about my type.

And what do you say about your type?

[tcaudilllg]

And what do you say about your type?

I've got far better things to do than to commit my limited time to a conversation with you, who has apparently no faith in his own intellectual competence. That said, if you want to learn more about the Bible you hold so dear, I will continue to discuss that with you.

As for my type, see my signature.

[Phaedrus]

No LSI would be that interested in theory. It never ever happens, because LSIs simply aren't interested in theory.

[Blaze]

I agree that it's stupid. TC rambles in a way that no LSI would. His voice in writing also lacks any real (or threatening) sense of . Authoritative in his judgments, but authority lacking that touch, though this could be due to my own (at times) blindness to matters.

yeah, and LSI likes to say things simply and clearly, not long convoluted, complex and dragged out. i agree that tdaud is some sort of Ne and Ti combo.

[Expat]

I would say EIE before LSI, because he sometimes seems to want to "mobilize" others emotionally, as in saying things like, "I am shocked -- SHOCKED -- that that paper by Augusta and Reinin hasn't been properly translated yet -- this shows the wiki's bias" -- or something like that (quoting from memory).

Of course, I guess he attributes that to ENFj being the exertion type?

For the record, this kind of stuff - like hitta's saying things like "this makes me wanna puke" or Phaedrus saying things like "I am getting really irritated" have precisely the opposite effect on me. I tend to think "so who cares if you're shocked" and "so go puke" and "then get irritated even more, who cares".

I have to guess that the expectation is to get some kind of reaction, as in "OMG he's shocked I better do something about it" or "no, calm down, no reason to get irritated, I didn't mean it that way" etc etc. On me it has pretty much the opposite effect.

[Phaedrus]

I would say EIE before LSI, because he sometimes seems to want to "mobilize" others emotionally, as in saying things like, "I am shocked -- SHOCKED -- that that paper by Augusta and Reinin hasn't been properly translated yet -- this shows the wiki's bias" -- or something like that (quoting from memory).

That is not an argument for -- not in the slightest. In a recent real life example where a person explicitly said that he was shocked about someone's behaviour (the behaviour of me and a friend of mine) the "shocked" person had in his ego block.

[Creepy-Cyclops]

That is not an argument for -- not in the slightest. In a recent real life example where a person explicitly said that he was shocked about someone's behaviour (the behaviour of me and a friend of mine) the "shocked" person had in his ego block.

I disagree. There's different levels of being shocked. Not having some script translated into English is not really a comment on someones behaviour, like your Ti person was doing. This is like an action purely to create a reaction, which is in this context is rather Fe imo

[Expat]

This is like an action purely to create a reaction, which is in this context is rather Fe imo

Precisely my point. Which is not to say, though, that he wasn't really "shocked"; but to say it, as in "I am SHOCKED -- SHOCKED" is a way to call attention to his emotional state, and expecting some reaction, even if just the attention.

[Park]

This is like an action purely to create a reaction, which is in this context is rather Fe imo

This reminds me how performing music on stage is related to Fe and why I suck at it.

It's all about provoking a reaction! (< not really)

[Phaedrus]

I disagree. There's different levels of being shocked. Not having some script translated into English is not really a comment on someones behaviour, like your Ti person was doing. This is like an action purely to create a reaction, which is in this context is rather Fe imo

Maybe. But Expat uses it as an argument for certain types, and as you can see for yourself, it is a very unreliable typing method. That he uses it so much is the main cause of some of his mistypings.