Which PoLR is easiest to spot?

[liveandletlive]

yay no one said !

IMO, i'd have to say PoLR for being the most obvious.

[liveandletlive]

Read the post directly above, and you'll see that I just said .

shut up.

[xyz]

the claws come out.

[liveandletlive]

ROFL, I wasn't being condescending there. The smilie says all.

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ght=definition
sorry if i misunderstood seeing as is quite the ambiguous "smilie."

[XoX]

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ght=definition
sorry if i misunderstood seeing as is quite the ambiguous "smilie."

To summarize that thread for lazies...

Here is liveandletlive's interpretation

im making the executive decision that im using razz only to show disgust. it's face looks like it's about to spew all over my computer screen.

whereas my interpretation is probably closer to what Herzy meant

I guess it is kind of "don't take what I said too seriously".

[Sol]

it's possibly to distinguish directly what functions are strong/weak, valued/nonvalued. but it's doubtful more
also the weakest functions are suggestive/role

[Kernel]

Playing up being weak looks more Se seeking than Se polr.

[mightylizard]

Playing up being weak looks more Se seeking than Se polr.

Maybe psychologically but not physically. A lot of Se-POLRs are capable of looking "psychologically strong" (maybe gritty is a better word) but they still typically look weak physically and will play this up (hunched over, arms crossed, have more of a tendency to dress in more muted colours, shuffle their feet). An LII-Ti woman I know: one look and you can tell that she is zero bullshit and strong willed, but that doesn't change the fact that it is also painfully obvious that she wouldn't have a clue how to respond if someone got physical with her.