Yeah, from my perspective Ne barely counts as a PoLR. All you have to do is explain the situation to them.
Yeah, from my perspective Ne barely counts as a PoLR. All you have to do is explain the situation to them.
but, i think explaining something or being able to see where an Ne ego is coming from doesn't make an Ne polr able to generate possibilities like the Ne ego. It's still a polr.
Right, well, doesn't that make sense?
I'm not really sure which ones stand out.
Ne porl is really obvious to me because I've dealt with it so much recently. I get into arguments with ISTjs and ISFjs at times because we're looking at the same thing from different perspectives and it can be problematic if there are no intuitive types to facilitate understanding.
Se polrs do not bother me, to me it is just like the "go ahead", the "green light" for being more protective towards that person.
- - -
The most annoying is ENFj's Si polr, IMO, because they need you to actually get angry and visibly reactive, just to sort of prove that they can be "calmed" down.
I do not have extensive experience with INFp Te polr, but with ISFps, they just sort of have a tendency to ... seem foolish? Childish? I don't know.
Last edited by UDP; 02-14-2008 at 05:06 PM.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
That makes sense.
My experience is the opposite... Ne PoLR's are the ones who seem to need reassurance (or at least assurance), but I'm sure it depends on what kind of reassurance you're offering them.Ni polrs are kind of annoying in that they need a sort of constant reassurance.
I always assumed that had more to do with Fe and Se than Si?The most annoying is ENFj's Si polr, IMO, because they need you to actually get angry and visibly reactive, just to sort of prove that they can be "calmed" down.
Last edited by Joy; 02-14-2008 at 01:16 AM.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
typo
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
PoLRs will, obviously, most easily annoy me, so I can definitely tell there is a strain between them and me. However, PoLRs are the easiest to spot; the concern (or lack of) for is easily the first thing people see when observing a person.
PoLR
Suggestive Function
Regular Double-shot Espresso Subtype
Just because I'm a thinking type doesn't mean I'm not an idiot.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
poof
yay no one said !
IMO, i'd have to say PoLR for being the most obvious.
ESFp-Fi sub
6w7 sx/so/sp
the claws come out.
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ght=definition
sorry if i misunderstood seeing as is quite the ambiguous "smilie."
ESFp-Fi sub
6w7 sx/so/sp