-

[Elro]

dee: 53
cracka: 27

Sorry, cracka. Better luck next time.

[cracka]

dee: 53
cracka: 27

Sorry, cracka. Better luck next time.

*Cracka has a life and work to worry about, Dee factors into that about as much as a midget getting kicked in the nuts somewhere in Egypt*

My posts in the beginning of this thread were out of pure boredom and disdain for Dee's posting style...

[cracka]

my ignore list currently consists:

merry aut0
merry, judicious cracka
decisive Garmonbozia
decisive, merry Gilly
decisive, merry Herzy
merry ifmd95
judicious Minde
? UDP
? Logos

total: 7 users
known serious-merry dichotomy: 5, reliability of result = 5/7= 72%
scored merry/serious = 5+1/0+1
known judicious-decisive dichotomy: 5, reliability of result = 5/7= 72%
scored d/j = 3/2, pointing to beta and alpha as my closest conflicting functional usage external modules.

For the record, I'd like to say how much I feel like I'm in good company on this list.

[Elro]

oh reaaaally? most of posts by these users i find very hard to read and often extremely upsetting.

lol... dee, if cracka is on your ignore list, how could you see his post?

[Elro]

Te usage... pure and simple.

No, I don't think so.

[Joy]

At this point I'm thinking SEI may make the most sense. Still not sure though.

[Joy]

come on, have you read any of the thread, Joy?

lol no

(You just reminded me of this poster from similarminds, that's all.)

[UDP]

Dee, click here and listen carefully.

-

[cracka]

i just was interested in the post and read it, for which i had to unignore him.

I'd put a rather large amount of money up, and bet that you've done this with every post I've made in this thread... making the fact that you're ignoring me quite stupid, to say the least. I'd imagine you do this for all the people on your ignore list though, so I don't feel too special.

[cracka]

I'd put you on ignore but you give me way too much ammo to be a dick to you with.

[cracka]

I'm starting to think that I'm being too much of an ass to you and will soon cross the line at which other posters here will start having a problem with me so with that said, I guess it's about time to stop talking so much shit to you... even though I myself feel that you bring it on yourself and deserve every bit that I dish out to you.

[cracka]

oh not again...

Nah, not this time... well... not after this one I guess. Unless you give me a reason to.

[marooned]

oh reaaaally? most of posts by these users i find very hard to read and often extremely upsetting.

!

[Garmonbozia]

How immature.

[krieger]

if i am ISFj, labcoat is right at evaluating me as static-negativist-result.

Gah; I retract that evaluation majorly.

Creative Fe is beginning to look plausible. Somehow if you had been an ISFp I think I would have noticed, so you're either INFp or just a weird ISFp.

Anyway, ISFj? No, that doesn't work. You don't honestly see yourself as a serious person who monitors others ethically, do you?

Not gonna burn my hands on your case again, though. Exploring all the ways to be wrong about you is not an experience I'd like to repeat more often than I have to.